Cisoń Hanna, Jankowska-Konsur Alina, Białynicki-Birula Rafał
University Centre of General Dermatology and Oncodermatology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):75. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010075.
: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), including Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), is a challenging-to-diagnose lymphoproliferative malignancy characterized by T-cell dysfunction and progressive cutaneous and extra cutaneous involvement. Disease severity assessment in CTCL is crucial for guiding treatment. This study aims to evaluate the interrater agreement and interrater reliability of mSWAT among dermatology residents and identify lesion types most prone to scoring variability. : Sixteen dermatology residents with varied experience levels assessed 14 patients with confirmed MF/SS diagnoses. Using mSWAT, residents independently scored lesions severity on a standardized set of patient's photos. The results were compared with reference mSWAT scores provided by an experienced clinician. Descriptive statistics and the Shapiro-Wilk test were applied to evaluate data distributions, while Student's -test assessed score deviations from reference values. Furthemore, we conducted a pilot the high frequency ultrasound (HFUS) study on a single patient, whose mSWAT score and photographs are also presented in the manuscript. : Significant discrepancies were observed in 64.29% of cases (9/14), with tumors and infiltrative lesions in erythrodermic SS patients posing particular scoring challenges. Misclassification of tumors as patches or plaques was a frequent issue, leading to underestimations in mSWAT scores. Residents' assessments of infiltrative lesions were also notably inconsistent. : This study highlights significant interobserver variability in mSWAT scoring among less experienced dermatology residents, particularly with tumor and erythrodermic lesions. Findings underscore the need for enhanced training and standardized scoring protocols to improve mSWAT reliability. Similar to other comparable indices, such as PASI, the mSWAT should be employed consistently by the same physician during each assessment to systematically monitor and evaluate the skin condition of a patient under observation. However, broader application requires the acquisition of sufficient experience. The study suggests the use of the HFUS as an objective method of assessment of the skin lesion infiltration in MF/SS patients.
皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL),包括蕈样肉芽肿(MF)和 Sézary 综合征(SS),是一种诊断具有挑战性的淋巴增殖性恶性肿瘤,其特征为T细胞功能障碍以及皮肤和皮肤外进行性受累。CTCL 中的疾病严重程度评估对于指导治疗至关重要。本研究旨在评估皮肤科住院医师之间 mSWAT 的评分者间一致性和评分者间可靠性,并确定最容易出现评分变异性的病变类型。16名经验水平各异的皮肤科住院医师对14例确诊为 MF/SS 的患者进行了评估。住院医师使用 mSWAT 对一组标准化的患者照片中的病变严重程度进行独立评分。将结果与一位经验丰富的临床医生提供的参考 mSWAT 评分进行比较。应用描述性统计和 Shapiro-Wilk 检验来评估数据分布,而 Student's -检验评估评分与参考值的偏差。此外,我们对一名患者进行了高频超声(HFUS)初步研究,该患者的 mSWAT 评分和照片也在本文中呈现。在64.29%的病例(9/14)中观察到显著差异,红皮病型 SS 患者的肿瘤和浸润性病变在评分方面存在特殊挑战。将肿瘤误分类为斑片或斑块是一个常见问题,导致 mSWAT 评分低估。住院医师对浸润性病变的评估也明显不一致。本研究强调了经验不足的皮肤科住院医师在 mSWAT 评分方面存在显著的观察者间变异性,特别是对于肿瘤和红皮病性病变。研究结果强调需要加强培训和标准化评分方案以提高 mSWAT 的可靠性。与其他类似指标(如PASI)一样,同一位医生在每次评估时应始终一致地使用 mSWAT,以系统地监测和评估观察中患者的皮肤状况。然而,更广泛的应用需要积累足够的经验。该研究建议使用 HFUS 作为评估 MF/SS 患者皮肤病变浸润的客观方法。