• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

取出近端位于心脏和血管内的自发性断裂导线——不同方法和工具的描述

Removal of Spontaneously Fractured Leads with Their Proximal Ends in the Heart and Vasculature-Description of Different Approaches and Tools.

作者信息

Kutarski Andrzej, Jacheć Wojciech, Pietura Radosław, Czajkowski Marek, Stefańczyk Paweł, Kosior Jarosław, Sawonik Sebastian, Nowosielecka Dorota

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 6;14(1):282. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010282.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14010282
PMID:39797364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11720824/
Abstract

Removal of spontaneously fractured leads with their proximal ends migrated into the vascular space has not been analysed in detail thus far. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different approaches and auxiliary tools for removing fractured leads with migrated proximal ends. Retrospective analysis of 72 cases from a database containing 3847 TLEs (transvenous lead extraction). Most of the leads were passive, especially unipolar. Procedure complexity in such cases was high but with satisfying effectiveness (procedural success rate 93.06%) and independent of the position of the proximal end. The rate of major complications was 2.78%, which may be attributed to long implant duration (152.2 months). Extraction of such leads did not influence long-term survival. The femoral approach was most often used (62.50%). In 79.16% of leads, mechanical dissection was required. In 66.7%, proximal ends were strongly attached to the wall, and a loop had to be applied. In 15.28% of procedures, the lead was wrapped around a pig-tail catheter ("spaghetti twisting technique"). (1) Spontaneous lead fracture with the proximal ends migrated into the vascular space is a rare finding (1.87% of the TLE). (2) Removal of such leads requires the use of different approaches as well as dedicated and non-dedicated tools. (3) Despite a high level of procedure complexity, its effectiveness is high, with an acceptable rate of major complications.

摘要

迄今为止,对于近端已迁移至血管腔内的自发性断裂导线的取出尚未进行详细分析。本研究旨在比较不同方法和辅助工具对于取出近端迁移的断裂导线的有效性。对一个包含3847例经静脉导线取出术(TLE)的数据库中的72例病例进行回顾性分析。大多数导线为被动电极,尤其是单极电极。此类病例的手术复杂性较高,但有效性令人满意(手术成功率93.06%),且与近端位置无关。主要并发症发生率为2.78%,这可能归因于植入时间较长(152.2个月)。取出此类导线不影响长期生存率。最常采用股静脉入路(62.50%)。79.16%的导线需要进行机械分离。66.7%的病例中,近端与血管壁紧密粘连,必须应用圈套器。15.28%的手术中,导线缠绕在猪尾导管上(“意大利面条扭转技术”)。(1)近端迁移至血管腔内的自发性导线断裂是一种罕见情况(占TLE的1.87%)。(2)取出此类导线需要采用不同方法以及专用和非专用工具。(3)尽管手术复杂性较高,但其有效性较高,主要并发症发生率可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/6daab2f7220e/jcm-14-00282-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/9ce34635d180/jcm-14-00282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/92fc2ac2c8a1/jcm-14-00282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/296651346226/jcm-14-00282-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/60979e2a698c/jcm-14-00282-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/238f6cd330e9/jcm-14-00282-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/6daab2f7220e/jcm-14-00282-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/9ce34635d180/jcm-14-00282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/92fc2ac2c8a1/jcm-14-00282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/296651346226/jcm-14-00282-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/60979e2a698c/jcm-14-00282-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/238f6cd330e9/jcm-14-00282-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf46/11720824/6daab2f7220e/jcm-14-00282-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Removal of Spontaneously Fractured Leads with Their Proximal Ends in the Heart and Vasculature-Description of Different Approaches and Tools.取出近端位于心脏和血管内的自发性断裂导线——不同方法和工具的描述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 6;14(1):282. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010282.
2
Leads with the Cut Proximal Ends Migrated into the Heart and Vasculature: A Rare Phenomenon among 3847 Lead Extraction Procedures.切割近端导线移位至心脏和血管:3847例导线拔除手术中的罕见现象。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 29;13(9):2602. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092602.
3
Removal of leads broken during extraction: A comparison of different approaches and tools.在提取过程中折断的导联的去除:不同方法和工具的比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Oct;35(10):1981-1996. doi: 10.1111/jce.16398. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
4
Analysis of 1051 ICD Leads Extractions in Search of Factors Affecting Procedure Difficulty and Complications: Number of Coils, Tip Fixation and Position-Does It Matter?对1051例植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线拔除术进行分析,以寻找影响手术难度和并发症的因素:线圈数量、电极头固定及位置——这些重要吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1261. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051261.
5
Outcomes of Transvenous Extraction of Leads Older Than 20 and 30 Years-A Large Cohort Study.经静脉取出 20 年以上和 30 年以上的导联的结果:一项大型队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 30;19(21):14184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114184.
6
Broken leads with proximal endings in the cardiovascular system: serious consequences and extraction difficulties.心血管系统中近端末端的断裂导联:严重后果和提取困难。
Cardiol J. 2013;20(2):161-9. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0029.
7
Comparison of outcomes and required tools between transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: Insight from single high-volume center experience.经静脉取出起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的结果和所需工具比较:单一大容量中心经验的见解。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;35(7):1382-1392. doi: 10.1111/jce.16294. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths: Results of a multicentre study.使用双向旋转机械鞘管经静脉取出极旧导线的结果:一项多中心研究的结果
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):728-737. doi: 10.1111/jce.15767. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths.使用双向旋转机械护套在 80 岁以上人群中行经静脉导线拔除术的结果。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;46(8):960-968. doi: 10.1111/pace.14696. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
10
Repeat Transvenous Lead Extraction-Predictors, Effectiveness, Complications and Long-Term Prognostic Significance.重复经静脉心脏导线拔除术——预测因素、有效性、并发症和长期预后意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315602.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of a broken venous port from the pulmonary artery: a case series.从肺动脉移除断裂的静脉端口:病例系列
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2025 Jun 24;22(2):112-119. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2025.152327. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Successful coronary sinus left ventricular lead extraction 9 years postimplantation using the wire ThRoUgh Snare Twice (wire TRUST) technique.采用两次钢丝圈套取出术(wire TRUST)在植入9年后成功取出冠状窦左心室导线。
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e9039. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9039. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
LECOM (Lead Extraction COMplexity): A New Scoring System for Predicting a Difficult Procedure.LECOM(导线拔除复杂性):一种用于预测困难手术的新评分系统。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 8;12(24):7568. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247568.
3
Usefulness of "heart-shaped sign" during "spaghetti twisting" technique in transvenous lead extraction.
经静脉导线拔除术中“意大利面扭转”技术时“心形征”的实用性。
J Arrhythm. 2023 Jul 2;39(4):627-629. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12890. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Unexpected Procedure Difficulties Increasing the Complexity of Transvenous Lead Extraction: The Single Centre Experience with 3721 Procedures.意外的手术困难增加经静脉导线拔除的复杂性:3721例手术的单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 11;12(8):2811. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082811.
5
Assessment of the impact of organisational model of transvenous lead extraction on the effectiveness and safety of procedure: an observational study.评估经静脉导线拔除术的组织模型对程序的有效性和安全性的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 29;12(12):e062952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062952.
6
A steerable introducer-assisted wire-loop snare technique: A bailout for unsuccessful lead extraction by a Needle's Eye Snare.一种可操控引导器辅助的线环圈套器技术:针对针眼圈套器进行导线取出失败时的补救方法。
J Arrhythm. 2022 Aug 9;38(5):821-823. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12766. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
The MB score: a new risk stratification index to predict the need for advanced tools in lead extraction procedures.MB 评分:一种新的风险分层指数,用于预测在导线提取程序中需要使用高级工具的情况。
Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):613-621. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa027.
8
2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.2017年心律学会心血管植入式电子装置导线管理与拔除专家共识声明
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
"Spaghetti twisting" technique: a novel method of catching pacemaker leads using a needle's eye snare.“意大利面扭转”技术:一种使用针眼圈套器捕获起搏器导线的新方法。
Clin Case Rep. 2017 Jun 23;5(8):1269-1273. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1050. eCollection 2017 Aug.
10
Predicting the difficulty of a transvenous lead extraction procedure: Validation of the LED index.预测经静脉导线拔除术的难度:LED指数的验证
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jul;28(7):811-818. doi: 10.1111/jce.13223. Epub 2017 May 9.