Vishwanathaiah Satish, Maganur Prabhadevi C, Maafa Shahad Mohammed, Tulays Asayil Mohammed, Hakami May Mohammed, Albar Nassreen H, Alessa Noura, Alhakami Khalid, Assiry Ali Ahmed, Alfaqih Amjad Ismail, Syed Ather Ahmed
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 11;31:e946802. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946802.
BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.
背景 传统上使用硬质合金车针去除龋齿,但最近已开发出非金属聚合物车针,目的是更具选择性且引起的疼痛更少。本研究的目的是评估和比较在儿科患者修复过程中使用智能车针和硬质合金车针对龋齿去除效果、所需时间和患者依从性。材料与方法 在儿童牙科门诊设计并开展了一项临床研究,重点关注40名6至12岁的儿童,他们被分为两组,每组20名儿童:第1组使用传统的硬质合金旋转车针,第2组使用智能车针。使用埃里克森量表评估龋齿去除效率。使用面部腿部活动哭闹可安慰性(FLACC)和面部表情疼痛评分量表(WBS)评估疼痛强度,并使用弗兰克尔行为评分量表(FBRS)评估儿童的行为。结果 在龋齿挖掘时间和埃里克森量表方面观察到统计学上的显著差异(P<0.001),智能车针组得分更高。在龋齿挖掘、修复和局部麻醉给药期间,智能车针组的WBS和FLACC得分通常低于硬质合金车针组,且这种差异非常显著(P<0.001)。结论 智能车针组儿童的疼痛感知较小且总体满意度较高,而传统硬质合金车针组的龋齿去除效率较高。