Suppr超能文献

病房内提供的经鼻高流量给氧和无创通气对急性呼吸衰竭患者是安全的:一项队列研究。

Ward-delivered nasal high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation are safe for people with acute respiratory failure: a cohort study.

作者信息

Buchan Catherine, Khor Yet Hong, Disler Rebecca, Naughton Matthew T, Smallwood Natasha

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Respiratory Research@Alfred, School of Translational Medicine, The Alfred Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2025 Apr;55(4):645-654. doi: 10.1111/imj.16624. Epub 2025 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ward-delivered non-invasive respiratory supports (NIRS) (conventional oxygen therapy (COT), high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV)), are often used to treat hospitalised patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) both in high acuity and general wards. This study aimed to describe the processes of care adopted and examine patient outcomes from a specialist, ward-delivered NIRS service caring for people with COVID-19 in general wards or in a respiratory care unit (RCU).

METHODS

A cohort study was undertaken including all consecutive patients admitted to a quaternary hospital with ARF secondary to COVID-19 and requiring ward-delivered NIRS between 28 February 2020 and 18 March 2022. NIRS use, processes of care and patient outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty-eight patients were included, with 61% male and a mean age of 64 years (interquartile range 48-79 years). All received COT. Fifty eight percent of patients required additional NIRS: HFNO (36.2%), CPAP (19.8%) and NIV (1.9%). Eighty-two percent of patients had oxygen saturation targets documented. After the implementation of the RCU, significantly more nurse consultant-led CPAP prescriptions were initiated (P = 0.004) and fewer patients required review by the ICU team (P = 0.001) or transfer to ICU (P = 0.050). Forty-nine patients died (7.3%), with most (62.8%) being discharged directly home.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that ward-delivered NIRS is feasible and safe for people with COVID-19 and ARF. The combination of ward and RCU-delivered NIRS was particularly effective. Further research is required to determine the optimal models of respiratory care required for a broader range of patients and to understand how these should be implemented.

摘要

背景与目的

病房提供的无创呼吸支持(NIRS)(传统氧疗(COT)、高流量鼻氧(HFNO)、持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和无创通气(NIV))常用于治疗高 acuity 和普通病房的急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)住院患者。本研究旨在描述所采用的护理流程,并检查在普通病房或呼吸护理单元(RCU)为 COVID-19 患者提供专科病房 NIRS 服务的患者结局。

方法

进行了一项队列研究,纳入 2020 年 2 月 28 日至 2022 年 3 月 18 日期间因 COVID-19 继发 ARF 并需要病房提供 NIRS 的所有连续入住四级医院的患者。检查了 NIRS 的使用、护理流程和患者结局。

结果

纳入 668 例患者,61%为男性,平均年龄 64 岁(四分位间距 48 - 79 岁)。所有患者均接受 COT。58%的患者需要额外的 NIRS:HFNO(36.2%)、CPAP(19.8%)和 NIV(1.9%)。82%的患者记录了氧饱和度目标。RCU 实施后,由护士顾问主导的 CPAP 处方显著增加(P = 0.004),需要重症监护病房(ICU)团队复查的患者减少(P = 0.001)或转至 ICU 的患者减少(P = 0.050)。49 例患者死亡(7.3%),大多数(62.8%)直接出院回家。

结论

本研究强调病房提供的 NIRS 对 COVID-19 和 ARF 患者是可行且安全的。病房和 RCU 提供的 NIRS 相结合特别有效。需要进一步研究以确定更广泛患者所需的最佳呼吸护理模式,并了解应如何实施这些模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d20/11981030/1180e31f3a47/IMJ-55-645-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验