Suppr超能文献

优化炎症性肠病患者的疲劳、腹痛和大便失禁(IBD - BOOST优化):初始护士主导管理的检查表和算法的可行性研究

Optimising fatigue, abdominal pain and faecal incontinence in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD-BOOST Optimise): feasibility study of a checklist and algorithm for initial nurse-led management.

作者信息

Stagg Imogen, Hart Ailsa, Cléirigh Büttner Fionn, Fikree Asma, McLaughlin John, LeBlanc Jean-Frederic, Bouri Sonia, Hamborg Thomas, Miller Laura, Norton Christine

机构信息

St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK.

Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 20;11(1):e001585. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001585.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience fatigue, pain and faecal incontinence that some feel are inadequately addressed. It is unknown how many have potentially reversible medical issues underlying these symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted a study testing the feasibility of a patient-reported symptom checklist and nurse-administered management algorithm ('Optimise') to manage common medical causes of IBD-related fatigue, pain and faecal incontinence. We conducted qualitative interviews with nurses implementing the algorithm.

RESULTS

515 individuals reporting IBD-related symptoms were invited to participate, of whom 201 (39%) consented. 194/201 (97%) returned the symptom checklist, of whom 157 (81%) returned a postal faecal calprotectin sample. Five (3%) participants reported 'red flags' and 31/157 (20%) participants had a faecal calprotectin result ≥200 µg/g, of whom 12 (8%) were judged to have likely active inflammation when clinical symptoms and disease history were reviewed. The algorithm suggested at least one clinical test or intervention for fatigue, pain or faecal incontinence in 67 (43%) participants, of whom 25 (37%) declined. Among 87 participants for whom clinical actions were indicated, 57 (66%) completed follow-up outcomes 3 months after algorithm implementation. Three nurses interviewed found the Optimise algorithm easy to administer.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the Optimise checklist and algorithm appears feasible in UK clinical practice, with adjustments needed to minimise missing items. Not all patients accepted algorithm-indicated interventions, but a yield of 43% with symptoms having potentially reversible causes detected is clinically useful. Nurses endorsed ease and utility of the implementation process. Optimise now needs clinical effectiveness to be assessed.

摘要

目的

许多炎症性肠病(IBD)患者经历疲劳、疼痛和大便失禁,有些人认为这些问题未得到充分解决。尚不清楚有多少人这些症状背后存在潜在可逆转的医学问题。

方法

我们开展了一项研究,测试患者报告的症状清单和护士执行的管理算法(“优化”)管理IBD相关疲劳、疼痛和大便失禁常见医学原因的可行性。我们对执行该算法的护士进行了定性访谈。

结果

邀请了515名报告有IBD相关症状的个体参与,其中201人(39%)同意。194/201人(97%)返回了症状清单,其中157人(81%)返回了粪便钙卫蛋白邮寄样本。5名(3%)参与者报告有“警示信号”,31/157名(20%)参与者的粪便钙卫蛋白结果≥200µg/g,在回顾临床症状和疾病史时,其中12人(8%)被判定可能有活动性炎症。该算法建议对67名(43%)参与者的疲劳、疼痛或大便失禁进行至少一项临床检查或干预,其中25人(37%)拒绝。在87名被建议采取临床行动的参与者中,57人(66%)在算法实施3个月后完成了随访结果。接受访谈的三名护士发现“优化”算法易于执行。

结论

在英国临床实践中实施“优化”清单和算法似乎可行,需要进行调整以尽量减少遗漏项目。并非所有患者都接受算法建议的干预措施,但检测出43%的症状有潜在可逆转原因的结果在临床上是有用的。护士认可实施过程的简便性和实用性。现在需要评估“优化”的临床有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8f/11664377/e4cc660e8811/bmjgast-11-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验