Suppr超能文献

使用透明矫治器和固定正畸矫治器治疗Ⅱ类错牙合拔牙方案中的体积和三维牙根吸收及牙槽骨变化:一项对比研究。

Volumetric and tridimensional root resorption and alveolar bone changes in Class II malocclusion extraction protocol treated with clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances: A comparative study.

作者信息

Almagrami Ibtehal, Albarakani Abduljabbar Yahya, Almashraqi Abeer A, Alhammadi Maged S, Al-Warafi Leena Ali, Almaqrami Maryam, Qiao Yiqiang

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Department of Pre-Clinical Oral Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 May;167(5):539-549. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.11.012. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the root resorption and alveolar bone changes of maxillary incisors volumetrically and 3-dimensionally in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion who underwent treatments involving the extraction of 4 first premolars with conventional fixed appliances (FAs) vs clear aligners (CAs).

METHODS

A total of 320 maxillary incisors from 80 patients were assessed and divided into 2 groups (FAs and CAs), each possessing similar baseline characteristics. Pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans were used to analyze linear and volumetric orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption, alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone height (ABH), as well as anteroposterior and vertical movements of maxillary incisors.

RESULTS

Both groups revealed a significant reduction in palatal ABT and an increase in labial ABT in both the central and lateral incisors. The total ABT reduction was more pronounced in the FAs group than in the CAs group (P <0.005). In terms of ABH, FAs treatment resulted in more labial and palatal marginal alveolar bone resorption around the maxillary incisors. The root length and volume losses in the CAs group were significantly less than those in the FAs group: 0.90 ± 0.97 vs 1.85 ± 1.18 mm and 19.59 ± 8.75 vs 24.28 ± 10.05 mm, respectively. The axial inclination was significantly less in the CAs group than in the FAs group: 8.83 ± 8.73 vs 2.64 ± 12.31°.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatments of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with FAs and CAs appeared to cause a statistically significant palatal ABT reduction and maxillary incisors root resorptions, with the FAs treatment causing a more significant effect. Both treatment modalities significantly reduced the ABH, with the greatest reduction found on the lateral incisors' palatal side in the FAs group. The CAs treatment resulted in a more significant incisor lingual tipping.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在对接受常规固定矫治器(FAs)或隐形矫治器(CAs)拔除4颗第一前磨牙治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的上颌切牙牙根吸收和牙槽骨变化进行容积和三维评估。

方法

对80例患者的320颗上颌切牙进行评估,并分为2组(FAs组和CAs组),每组具有相似的基线特征。使用治疗前和治疗后的锥形束计算机断层扫描分析正畸诱导的线性和容积性炎性牙根吸收、牙槽骨厚度(ABT)、牙槽骨高度(ABH)以及上颌切牙的前后向和垂直向移动。

结果

两组患者的中切牙和侧切牙腭侧ABT均显著降低,唇侧ABT均增加。FAs组的总ABT降低比CAs组更明显(P<0.005)。在ABH方面,FAs治疗导致上颌切牙周围唇侧和腭侧边缘牙槽骨吸收更多。CAs组牙根长度和体积损失明显小于FAs组,分别为0.90±0.97 vs 1.85±1.18mm和19.59±8.75 vs 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验