He Xiaoya, Zhou Xingyu, Cui Ya, Li Xiaojing, Zhou Yucong, Xia Yunhui, Zhu Min, Liu Jiaqiang, Mao Lixia
Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 May;167(5):591-603.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.12.007. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
This retrospective clinical study investigated root length and periodontal changes around maxillary incisors in patients with Class III skeletal malocclusion treated with fixed appliances (FAs) and clear aligners (CAs) by cone-beam computed tomography.
A total of 60 patients were equally divided into 2 groups based on the appliance type; cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained before treatment, after presurgical orthodontic treatment, and after orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. The measurements of root length, vertical alveolar bone level, and horizontal alveolar bone thickness at 4 levels (3, 6, and 9 mm from the cementoenamel junction and root apex level) surrounding the maxillary incisors were compared. The tooth movement of maxillary incisors during the presurgical phase was evaluated.
The root length of maxillary incisors decreased in both groups, with the CA group experiencing a small reduction (1.09 ± 0.70 mm) compared with the FA group (1.29 ± 0.73 mm) after treatment. The FA group showed more pronounced reductions in palatal alveolar bone thickness and vertical alveolar bone level, along with greater root lingual movement during the presurgical orthodontic phase. Postsurgically, although both groups saw an increase in labial incisor inclination, the FA group primarily exhibited root lingual movement, as opposed to the labial tipping movement observed in the CA group.
The results indicated that FAs and CAs could trigger root resorption and marginal alveolar bone loss, with FA treatment associated with a more pronounced impact. Although CA may offer advantages in minimizing root resorption and conserving alveolar bone integrity, it provides inferior control over anterior torque compared with FA. Careful consideration is crucial to prevent iatrogenic degeneration during the whole phase of orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment.
本回顾性临床研究通过锥形束计算机断层扫描,调查了使用固定矫治器(FAs)和透明矫治器(CAs)治疗的III类骨性错牙合患者上颌切牙周围的牙根长度和牙周变化。
根据矫治器类型将60例患者平均分为2组;在治疗前、术前正畸治疗后和正畸-正颌治疗后进行锥形束计算机断层扫描。比较上颌切牙周围4个水平(距牙釉质牙骨质界3、6和9mm以及根尖水平)的牙根长度、垂直牙槽骨水平和水平牙槽骨厚度。评估术前阶段上颌切牙的牙齿移动情况。
两组上颌切牙的牙根长度均减少,治疗后CA组的减少量较小(1.09±0.70mm),而FA组为(1.29±0.73mm)。FA组在术前正畸阶段腭侧牙槽骨厚度和垂直牙槽骨水平的减少更为明显,牙根舌向移动也更大。术后,尽管两组唇侧切牙倾斜度均增加,但FA组主要表现为牙根舌向移动,而CA组观察到的是唇向倾斜移动。
结果表明,FAs和CAs均可引发牙根吸收和牙槽嵴顶骨丧失,FA治疗的影响更为明显。尽管CA在最小化牙根吸收和保持牙槽骨完整性方面可能具有优势,但与FA相比,其对前牙转矩的控制较差。在正畸-正颌外科治疗的整个阶段,谨慎考虑对于预防医源性退变至关重要。