Suppr超能文献

优化血培养操作:在心胸外科手术患者中实施诊断管理

Fine-tuning blood culture practices: implementing diagnostic stewardship in cardiothoracic surgery patients.

作者信息

Seidelman Jessica, Pena Heather, Zwischenberger Brittany A

机构信息

Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf005.

Abstract

Overusing blood cultures (BCxs) can lead to false positives, unnecessary antibiotics and increased healthcare costs. Despite studies on inpatient BCx algorithms, none have focused on cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) patients, with complex postoperative care and invasive devices. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a BCx algorithm on BCx event (BCE) rates in CTS step-down units. The study was conducted in three CTS step-down units at Duke University Hospital. The BCx algorithm, based on Seidelman et al. (2023), was implemented in June 2023. BCE rates, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and adverse outcome IRRs were compared between pre- and post-intervention periods using ITS and χ2 tests. We analysed 4978 BCE during the study period: 3439 (893 patients) pre-intervention and 1539 (452 patients) post-intervention. BCE rates decreased [IRR = 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.83, P-value< 0.01)] without significant differences in adverse outcomes such as central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates (IRR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.17, 2.30), readmission rates (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.88, 1.12) or in-hospital mortality (IRR = 3.53, 95% CI 0.32, 38.90). Our study supports the beneficial effects of a BCx algorithm, which reduces unnecessary BCxs in CTS patients without compromising patient safety.

摘要

过度使用血培养(BCx)会导致假阳性、不必要的抗生素使用以及医疗成本增加。尽管有关于住院患者血培养算法的研究,但尚无研究聚焦于心胸外科(CTS)患者,这类患者术后护理复杂且使用侵入性设备。本研究旨在评估血培养算法对CTS术后监护病房中血培养事件(BCE)发生率的影响。该研究在杜克大学医院的三个CTS术后监护病房进行。基于Seidelman等人(2023年)的血培养算法于2023年6月实施。使用中断时间序列(ITS)分析和卡方检验比较干预前后时期的BCE发生率、发病率比(IRR)和不良结局IRR。我们在研究期间分析了4978次BCE:干预前3439次(893例患者),干预后1539次(452例患者)。BCE发生率降低[IRR = 0.78(95%置信区间(CI)0.74,0.83,P值<0.01)],而诸如中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)发生率(IRR = 0.6,95% CI 0.17,2.30)、再入院率(IRR = 0.99,95% CI 0.88,1.12)或住院死亡率(IRR = 3.53,95% CI 0.32,38.90)等不良结局无显著差异。我们的研究支持血培养算法的有益效果,该算法可减少CTS患者不必要的血培养,且不影响患者安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/113d/11758502/7b049d944255/ivaf005f1.jpg

相似文献

7
Consequences of Implementing a "Better" Blood Culture System.实施“更好的”血培养系统的后果。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Aug/Sep;19(6):582-586. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.239. Epub 2018 May 29.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验