Seidelman Jessica, Pena Heather, Zwischenberger Brittany A
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf005.
Overusing blood cultures (BCxs) can lead to false positives, unnecessary antibiotics and increased healthcare costs. Despite studies on inpatient BCx algorithms, none have focused on cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) patients, with complex postoperative care and invasive devices. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a BCx algorithm on BCx event (BCE) rates in CTS step-down units. The study was conducted in three CTS step-down units at Duke University Hospital. The BCx algorithm, based on Seidelman et al. (2023), was implemented in June 2023. BCE rates, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and adverse outcome IRRs were compared between pre- and post-intervention periods using ITS and χ2 tests. We analysed 4978 BCE during the study period: 3439 (893 patients) pre-intervention and 1539 (452 patients) post-intervention. BCE rates decreased [IRR = 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.83, P-value< 0.01)] without significant differences in adverse outcomes such as central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates (IRR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.17, 2.30), readmission rates (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.88, 1.12) or in-hospital mortality (IRR = 3.53, 95% CI 0.32, 38.90). Our study supports the beneficial effects of a BCx algorithm, which reduces unnecessary BCxs in CTS patients without compromising patient safety.
过度使用血培养(BCx)会导致假阳性、不必要的抗生素使用以及医疗成本增加。尽管有关于住院患者血培养算法的研究,但尚无研究聚焦于心胸外科(CTS)患者,这类患者术后护理复杂且使用侵入性设备。本研究旨在评估血培养算法对CTS术后监护病房中血培养事件(BCE)发生率的影响。该研究在杜克大学医院的三个CTS术后监护病房进行。基于Seidelman等人(2023年)的血培养算法于2023年6月实施。使用中断时间序列(ITS)分析和卡方检验比较干预前后时期的BCE发生率、发病率比(IRR)和不良结局IRR。我们在研究期间分析了4978次BCE:干预前3439次(893例患者),干预后1539次(452例患者)。BCE发生率降低[IRR = 0.78(95%置信区间(CI)0.74,0.83,P值<0.01)],而诸如中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)发生率(IRR = 0.6,95% CI 0.17,2.30)、再入院率(IRR = 0.99,95% CI 0.88,1.12)或住院死亡率(IRR = 3.53,95% CI 0.32,38.90)等不良结局无显著差异。我们的研究支持血培养算法的有益效果,该算法可减少CTS患者不必要的血培养,且不影响患者安全。