Keserű Dóra, Hajnik Tünde, Pethő Máté, Détári László, Van Den Bossche Maarten, Tóth Attila
In vivo Electrophysiology Research Group, Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary.
Geriatric Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Neuropsychiatry, Research Group Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2025 Mar;248:173954. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2025.173954. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Dopaminergic system gains importance in homeostatic sleep regulation, but the role of different dopamine receptors is not well-defined. 72 h rat electrocorticogram and sleep recordings were made after single application of dopaminergic drugs in clinical use or at least underwent clinical trials. The non-selective agonist apomorphine evoked short pharmacological sleep deprivation with intense wakefulness followed by pronounced sleep rebound. D2 agonist bromocriptine induced moderate and extended increase in wakefulness without a homeostatic sleep replacement but downregulated slow wave sleep need for 72 h. Selective D1 agonist SKF-38393 failed to induce enhanced waking sufficient for sleep replacement. High-dose D2 antagonism by sulpiride temporarily enhanced wakefulness. All drugs evoked extended (72 h) sleep changes after single application. Opposite sleep changes could be seen after the application of different doses in case of both bromocriptine and sulpiride. Theta, beta and gamma power reflected intensity differences in drug-induced wakefulness stages. Apomorphine- and high sulpiride dose-induced waking showed elevated power in all three frequency bands. Bromocriptine-induced wakefulness dominated by beta activity. Enhancement of more, than one type of electrocorticogram activities during wakefulness was a prerequisite for the activation of sleep homeostasis. According to present data, D1- or D2-like receptor agonism are not separately involved in the homeostatic regulation of slow wave sleep. Simultaneous and non-selective agonism on DA receptors is the most effective way to elicit intense W, which is followed by slow wave sleep rebound. REM sleep rebound could be evoked by D2 agonism. Rebound indicates the activation of homeostatic sleep regulation, but with unknown exact mechanisms.
多巴胺能系统在稳态睡眠调节中变得愈发重要,但不同多巴胺受体的作用尚未明确界定。在单次应用临床使用的多巴胺能药物或至少经过临床试验的药物后,对大鼠进行了72小时的脑电图和睡眠记录。非选择性激动剂阿扑吗啡诱发短暂的药物性睡眠剥夺,伴有强烈觉醒,随后出现明显的睡眠反弹。D2激动剂溴隐亭导致觉醒适度且持续增加,没有稳态睡眠替代,但在72小时内下调了慢波睡眠需求。选择性D1激动剂SKF-38393未能诱导出足以替代睡眠的增强觉醒。舒必利的高剂量D2拮抗作用暂时增强了觉醒。所有药物单次应用后均引起了持续(72小时)的睡眠变化。在溴隐亭和舒必利的情况下,应用不同剂量后可观察到相反的睡眠变化。θ波、β波和γ波功率反映了药物诱发觉醒阶段的强度差异。阿扑吗啡和高剂量舒必利诱导的觉醒在所有三个频段均显示功率升高。溴隐亭诱导的觉醒以β活动为主。觉醒期间一种以上类型的脑电图活动增强是激活睡眠稳态的先决条件。根据目前的数据,D1或D2样受体激动作用并非分别参与慢波睡眠的稳态调节。对多巴胺受体同时进行非选择性激动是引发强烈觉醒的最有效方法,随后是慢波睡眠反弹。D2激动作用可诱发快速眼动睡眠反弹。反弹表明稳态睡眠调节被激活,但其确切机制尚不清楚。