• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯喂养与持续喂养及其对危重症患者肠道微生物群的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Sequential versus continuous feeding and its effect on the gut microbiota in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Yao Bo, Liu Jian-Yu, Liu Ying, Song Xiao-Xia, Wang Shi-Bo, Liu Nan, Dong Zhen-Hui, Yuan Zhi-Yong, Han Xiao-Ning, Xing Jin-Yan

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 758 Hefei Road, Qingdao, Shandong, 266035, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 1677 Wutaishan Road, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China.

Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs, The Ministry of Education of China, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, 23 Hong Kong East Road, Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, China.

出版信息

Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Apr;66:245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.019
PMID:39798866
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gut microbiota disturbance may worsen critical illnesses and is responsible for the progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In our previous study, there was a trend towards a higher α-diversity of the gut microbiota in sequential feeding (SF) than in continuous feeding (CF) for critically ill patients. We designed this non-blinded, randomized controlled study to confirm these results.

METHODS

All the enrolled patients received continuous feeding in the beginning. After achieving ≥80 % of the nutrition target calories (25-30 kcal/kg/d), the patients were randomized into the SF group or the CF group. In the SF group, continuous feeding was changed into intermittent feeding. The total daily dosage of enteral nutrition was equally distributed during three periods at 7-9:00, 11-13:00 and 17-19:00. After 7 days of randomization, fresh stool and serum were collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and untargeted metabolomics analysis respectively. Meanwhile, routine blood test indicators and metabolic indicators were recorded.

RESULTS

Finally, data from 65 patients in the SF group and 69 patients in the CF group were used for intention-to-treat analysis. There was no difference in the Shannon index between the SF group and CF group [2.5 (1.7-3.4) vs. 2.6 (1.5-3.5), P = 0.934]. However, at the genus level, the abundances of Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-003 and Howardella increased in the SF group. Some metabolic indicators (the albumin level, total cholesterol level and total bile acid level) and the increases in lymphocyte counts in the SF group were different from those in the CF group (P < 0.05). In untargeted metabolomic analysis, 58 differentially abundant metabolites between the two groups were found. The pathway with the highest enrichment factors was primary bile acid biosynthesis according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Database classification. Regarding adverse events, the gut tolerance, average glucose and incidence of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia were similar between the SF group and CF group. The mortality rate in the SF group was lower than that in the CF group, but there was no statistical difference (9.2 % vs. 13.0 %, P = 0.484).

CONCLUSION

SF did not increase the diversity of gut microbiota in critically ill patients. However, it did alter the abundances of some gut microbes and affect some metabolites. Its clinical significance requires further exploration. In addition, the gut tolerance and safety of SF were similar to that of CF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, registration number NCT04443335. Registered 21 June, 2020.

摘要

背景

肠道微生物群紊乱可能会加重危重症病情,并导致多器官功能障碍综合征的进展。在我们之前的研究中,危重症患者序贯喂养(SF)时肠道微生物群的α多样性有高于持续喂养(CF)的趋势。我们设计了这项非盲法随机对照研究来证实这些结果。

方法

所有入组患者起初均接受持续喂养。在达到营养目标热量(25 - 30千卡/千克/天)的≥80%后,将患者随机分为SF组或CF组。在SF组,持续喂养改为间歇喂养。肠内营养的每日总剂量在7 - 9:00、11 - 13:00和17 - 19:00三个时间段平均分配。随机分组7天后,分别采集新鲜粪便和血清用于16S rRNA基因测序和非靶向代谢组学分析。同时,记录常规血液检测指标和代谢指标。

结果

最后,SF组65例患者和CF组69例患者的数据用于意向性分析。SF组和CF组的香农指数无差异[2.5(1.7 - 3.4)对2.6(1.5 - 3.5),P = 0.934]。然而,在属水平上,SF组中丹毒丝菌科_UCG - 003和霍氏菌属的丰度增加。SF组的一些代谢指标(白蛋白水平、总胆固醇水平和总胆汁酸水平)以及淋巴细胞计数的增加与CF组不同(P < 0.05)。在非靶向代谢组学分析中,发现两组间有58种差异丰富的代谢物。根据京都基因与基因组百科全书数据库分类,富集因子最高的途径是初级胆汁酸生物合成。关于不良事件,SF组和CF组的肠道耐受性、平均血糖以及高血糖和低血糖的发生率相似。SF组的死亡率低于CF组,但无统计学差异(9.2%对13.0%,P = 0.484)。

结论

SF未增加危重症患者肠道微生物群的多样性。然而,它确实改变了一些肠道微生物的丰度并影响了一些代谢物。其临床意义需要进一步探索。此外,SF的肠道耐受性和安全性与CF相似。

试验注册

www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov,注册号NCT04443335。2020年6月21日注册。

相似文献

1
Sequential versus continuous feeding and its effect on the gut microbiota in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.序贯喂养与持续喂养及其对危重症患者肠道微生物群的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Apr;66:245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Alteration of gut microbiota and metabolomics in critically ill patients by sequential feeding: A pilot study.序贯喂养对危重症患者肠道微生物群和代谢组学的影响:一项初步研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Mar;46(3):538-545. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2198. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
3
Comparison of sequential feeding and continuous feeding on the blood glucose of critically ill patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.序贯喂养与连续喂养对危重症患者血糖影响的比较:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Jul 20;134(14):1695-1700. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001684.
4
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
5
Fecal metabonomics combined with 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyze the changes of gut microbiota in rats with kidney-yang deficiency syndrome and the intervention effect of You-gui pill.基于粪便代谢组学联合 16S rRNA 基因测序分析肾阳虚证大鼠肠道菌群变化及右归丸的干预作用
J Ethnopharmacol. 2019 Nov 15;244:112139. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112139. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
Intermittent feeding with an overnight fast versus 24-h feeding in critically ill neonates, infants, and children: An open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial.间断喂养联合夜间禁食与 24 小时喂养在危重症新生儿、婴儿和儿童中的比较:一项开放标签、单中心、随机对照试验。
Clin Nutr. 2023 Sep;42(9):1569-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
7
Re-initiation of Oral Food Intake Following Enteral Nutrition Alters Oral and Gut Microbiota Communities.经肠营养后重新开始口服摄入改变了口腔和肠道微生物群落。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Dec 20;9:434. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00434. eCollection 2019.
8
Feeding the critically ill obese patient: a systematic review protocol.为危重症肥胖患者提供营养支持:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):95-109. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2458.
9
Impact of daily cyclic enteral nutrition versus standard continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in three intensive care units in France (DC-SCENIC).每日循环肠内营养与标准持续肠内营养对危重症患者的影响:法国三个重症监护病房的随机对照试验研究方案(DC-SCENIC)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):e080003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080003.
10
Variation of Serum Uric Acid Is Associated With Gut Microbiota in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.血清尿酸的变化与糖尿病患者的肠道微生物群有关。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jan 18;11:761757. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.761757. eCollection 2021.