Spadaccio Cristiano, Salsano Antonio, Altarabsheh Salah, Castro-Varela Alejandra, Gallego Navarro Carlos, Juarez Casso Fernando, Abdelrehim Ahmed, Andi Kartik, Ribeiro Rafaela V P, Choi Kukbin, Knop Gustavo, Kennedy Cassie C, Pennington Kelly M, Spencer Philip J, Daly Richard, Villavicencio Mauricio, Cypel Marcelo, Saddoughi Sahar A
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
DISC Department, University of Genoa, Italy.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 May;44(5):708-718. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.010. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx).
Literature search (terms "lung transplantation" AND "donation after circulatory death") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated.
21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs.
This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.
通过对比较研究的荟萃分析,探讨供体类型(脑死亡供体DBD与循环死亡供体DCD)对肺移植(LTx)短期和长期结局的影响。
截至2022年7月进行文献检索(检索词为“肺移植”和“循环死亡后捐赠”),并选择比较DCD与DBD肺移植结局的研究。主要终点为早期和长期死亡率。次要结局包括原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)、急性排斥反应和术后并发症。通过从每个可用的Kaplan-Meier曲线中检索数据来分析长期生存率,并估计DBD和DCD之间长期生存的受限平均生存时间差异。
纳入21项研究,共60105例患者(DBD=58548例,DCD=1557例)。两组间受者和供者的基线特征相似。未观察到明显的发表偏倚。早期死亡率的合并优势比估计有利于DBD(OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00,I²=0%)。急性排斥反应风险(OR=1.33,CI=0.82-2.17)和2-3级PGD(OR=0.88,CI=0.69-1.13)未观察到统计学显著差异。DBD组和DCD组的1年和5年生存率分别为82.1%和51.2%,以及86.2%和62.7%(对数秩检验,p<0.0001)。以DCD为参照,未调整的风险比为0.693。与DBD肺相比,DCD肺在5年内的生存率提高了4.82%。
这项对DCD和DBD之间比较研究的荟萃分析表明,尽管DCD肺移植在短期内有轻微但统计学上显著增加的死亡风险,但DCD肺移植具有显著的长期生存优势。数据支持继续采用DCD以增加肺供体库。