Albisinni Simone, Orecchia Luca, Mjaess Georges, Aoun Fouad, Del Giudice Francesco, Antonelli Luca, Moschini Marco, Soria Francesco, Mertens Laura S, Gallioli Andrea, Marcq Gauthier, Pradere Benjamin, Bochner Bernard, Breda Alberto, Briganti Alberto, Catto James, Decaestecker Karel, Gontero Paolo, Kamat Ashish, Lambert Edward, Minervini Andrea, Mottrie Alexandre, Roupret Morgan, Shariat Shahrokh, Wijburg Carl, Rieken Malte, Wiklund Peter, Mari Andrea
Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;51(3):109543. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item.
A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes. Embase and Medline (through Pubmed) were searched systematically. Relevant articles were selected and graded. For each ERAS item, a level of evidence was determined. An e-Delphi consensus was then performed amongst an international panel with renowned experience in RC to provide recommendations based on expert opinion.
Preoperative medical optimization and avoiding bowel preparation are highly recommended. Robotic-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion is moderately recommended and can help in applying other ERAS items, such as early mobilization. Medical thromboprophylaxis should be administered and nasogastric tube should be removed at the end of surgery. Perioperative fluid restriction as well as opioid-sparing anesthesia protocols should be implemented. Generally, consensus was reached on most ERAS items, with the exception of epidural anesthesia (no consensus), resection site drainage (consensus against), and type of urinary drainage. Limitations include the lack of a multidisciplinary approach to the present consensus, giving however a highly specialized surgical opinion on ERAS.
and clinical implications: The current study updates ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and suggests application of ERAS by a panel of experts in the field.
根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的术后加速康复(ERAS)指南于十多年前发布。本系统评价的目的是更新针对接受RC手术患者的ERAS建议,并对每个ERAS项目的相关性给出专家意见。
进行系统评价以确定每个ERAS项目对RC手术结果的影响。系统检索了Embase和Medline(通过PubMed)。选择并分级相关文章。确定每个ERAS项目的证据水平。然后在一个在RC方面具有丰富经验的国际专家小组中进行电子德尔菲共识,以基于专家意见提供建议。
强烈建议术前进行医学优化并避免肠道准备。适度推荐机器人辅助的RC联合体内尿液改道,这有助于应用其他ERAS项目,如早期活动。应进行药物性血栓预防,手术结束时应拔除鼻胃管。应实施围手术期液体限制以及减少阿片类药物的麻醉方案。总体而言,除了硬膜外麻醉(未达成共识)、切除部位引流(反对达成共识)和尿液引流类型外,大多数ERAS项目达成了共识。局限性包括本次共识缺乏多学科方法,但给出了关于ERAS的高度专业化的外科意见。
本研究更新了针对接受RC手术患者的ERAS建议,并建议由该领域的专家小组应用ERAS。