Babey Anna-Marie, Koenig Jennifer, Cunningham Margaret, Shield Alison, Restini Carolina, Djouma Elvan, Mraiche Fatima, Mifsud Janet, Kelly John P, Nicolazzo Joseph, Karpa Kelly J, Volbrecht Kieran, Santiago Marina Junqueira, Hawes Martin, Aljofan Mohamad, Kelly-Laubscher Roisin, Karunaratne Nilushi, Tucker Steven J, Hinton Tina, Liang Willmann, Guilding Clare, White Paul J
School of Science & Technology, University of New England, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 5;990:177256. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177256. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Both educators and graduates have expressed concern about a perceived pharmacology knowledge gap that includes difficulty applying fundamental principles to clinical and research problems. Consequently, we sought to determine the extent to which current students can explain the meaning of, and appropriately apply, a subset of core concepts, and to identify any misconceptions arising from the responses. Of the twenty-four pharmacology core concepts arising from the recent international collaboration, four pharmacokinetic concepts were chosen, namely drug bioavailability, drug clearance, volume of distribution, and steady-state concentration. A total of 318 students from 11 universities across seven countries chose to participate in this study. Expert analysts identified the essential elements for each concept, then independently assessed each student's response. Teams of two experts compared their evaluations to reach a consensus and grouped misconceptions thematically. For each core concept, less than 30% of students provided responses that encompassed all essential elements. Participants found drug clearance most challenging, generally conflating it with the rate of elimination, whereas they demonstrated a better understanding of drug bioavailability. There were 34 misconception themes coded in a total of 813 statements, with volume of distribution and drug clearance producing the highest numbers (13 and 12, respectively). Overall, results suggest that students found it easier to apply the concept than to explain its meaning, which might reflect the shift from didactic to active learning approaches. These findings may be useful for educators who are developing introductory pharmacokinetic courses by providing conceptual focus and revealing common misconceptions to explicitly address.
教育工作者和毕业生都对一种明显的药理学知识差距表示担忧,这种差距包括难以将基本原理应用于临床和研究问题。因此,我们试图确定当前学生能够解释核心概念子集的含义并适当应用的程度,并识别回答中产生的任何误解。在最近的国际合作中产生的24个药理学核心概念中,选择了四个药代动力学概念,即药物生物利用度、药物清除率、分布容积和稳态浓度。来自七个国家11所大学的318名学生选择参与这项研究。专家分析人员确定了每个概念的基本要素,然后独立评估每个学生的回答。由两名专家组成的团队比较他们的评估结果以达成共识,并将误解按主题进行分类。对于每个核心概念,不到30%的学生给出了包含所有基本要素的回答。参与者发现药物清除率最具挑战性,通常将其与消除速率混淆,而他们对药物生物利用度的理解较好。在总共813条陈述中编码了34个误解主题,分布容积和药物清除率产生的误解主题数量最多(分别为13个和12个)。总体而言,结果表明学生发现应用概念比解释其含义更容易,这可能反映了从讲授式学习方法向主动学习方法的转变。这些发现可能对正在开发药代动力学入门课程的教育工作者有用,因为它们提供了概念重点并揭示了需要明确解决的常见误解。