Decaix Théodore, Mouton-Liger François, Dumurgier Julien, Cognat Emmanuel, Vrillon Agathe, Hugon Jacques, Hourregue Claire, Bouaziz-Amar Elodie, Wallon David, Muraine Muriel Quillard, Troussière Anne-Cécile, Magnin Eloi, Duron Emmanuelle, Philippi Nathalie, Blanc Frédéric, Gabelle Audrey, Croisile Bernard, Jager Alain, Pasquier Florence, Schraen Susanna, Sayette Vincent de la, Beaufils Émilie, Miguet-Alfonsi Carole, Paquet Claire, Lilamand Matthieu
Geriatrics Department, Fernand Widal Lariboisière University Hospital, GHU APHP.Nord, Paris, France; Paris-Cité University, CNRS, CitCoM, F-75006, Paris, France.
Paris-Cité University, Inserm U1144, Paris, France.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jan;12(1):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100009. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
The use of cerebrospinal (CSF) biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been gaining interest in clinical practice. Although their usefulness has been demonstrated, their potential value in older patients remains debated.
To assess whether knowledge of the results of CSF AD biomarkers was associated with the same gain in diagnostic confidence in older adults > 80 than in younger patients.
Prospective multicenter study, including memory clinics physicians who completed a two-part questionnaire for all their patients addressing the requirement for assessment of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in CSF proposed as part of routine care during the study period.
30 secondary or tertiary memory clinics in France.
Clinicians indicated their diagnosis hypothesis and an estimate of their diagnostic confidence [scale 1-10]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, including the calculation of the area under the curve (AUC), was conducted using logistic regression to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CSF AD biomarkers.
In 813 consecutive patients, median age 70 [interquartile range (IQR) = 63 - 77] including 132 patients over 80 years, we observed a similar confidence gain in CSF biomarkers between older and younger patients, both for AD and non-AD diagnoses. In older patients, the added value of CSF biomarkers was greater when CSF biomarkers indicated AD profile whereas the initial hypothesis was "non-AD", leading to a final diagnosis of AD (2.4 ± 1.6 versus 1.1 ± 2.1, p-value, p = 0.03). ROC analyses showed similar performance of AD CSF biomarkers in older and younger patients.
CSF AD biomarkers added substantial value to clinical assessment in patients over 80. Their use seems crucial in the diagnostic process for older adults referred to memory clinics.
脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物在阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断中的应用在临床实践中越来越受到关注。尽管其有用性已得到证实,但其在老年患者中的潜在价值仍存在争议。
评估脑脊液AD生物标志物结果的知晓是否与80岁以上老年人相比年轻患者在诊断信心方面有相同程度的提高。
前瞻性多中心研究,纳入记忆门诊医生,他们为所有患者填写了一份两部分的问卷,问卷涉及在研究期间作为常规护理一部分提议评估脑脊液中阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的要求。
法国的30家二级或三级记忆门诊。
临床医生指出他们的诊断假设并估计他们的诊断信心[1 - 10分制]。使用逻辑回归进行受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,包括计算曲线下面积(AUC),以评估脑脊液AD生物标志物的诊断性能。
在813例连续患者中,中位年龄70岁[四分位间距(IQR)= 63 - 77],其中132例患者年龄超过80岁,我们观察到老年和年轻患者在脑脊液生物标志物方面对于AD和非AD诊断的信心提高相似。在老年患者中,当脑脊液生物标志物显示AD特征而初始假设为“非AD”并最终诊断为AD时,脑脊液生物标志物的附加值更大(2.4±1.6对1.1±2.1,p值,p = 0.03)。ROC分析显示老年和年轻患者中AD脑脊液生物标志物的性能相似。
脑脊液AD生物标志物为80岁以上患者的临床评估增加了重要价值。它们的使用在转诊至记忆门诊的老年人的诊断过程中似乎至关重要。