The Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin II for Treatment of Vasoplegia in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize evidence regarding intravenous angiotensin II administration in critical illness and provide an updated understanding of its effects on various organ dysfunction and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) biomarkers.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

SETTING

A search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 3, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized trials, quasi-randomized trials, observational studies, case reports, and case series were included. Comparative studies (RCTs and observational studies with comparator) were used for the main analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Critically ill adults and children.

INTERVENTIONS

Intravenous angiotensin II administration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies with a total of 2,918 participants (5 RCTs, 15 observational studies, and 39 case reports or case series) were analyzed. Septic shock and cardiac surgery were the most common clinical conditions (14 studies for each). In 14 comparative studies (5 RCTs and 9 observational studies), mortality was not different from that in controls, except in 1 observational study. Several studies reported decreased renal replacement therapy use, improved oxygenation and blood pressure response, and decreased rate of myocardial injury with angiotensin II therapy. There was no increase in thrombotic events or adverse events. Angiotensin II therapy reduced renin and angiotensin I levels without affecting other RAS biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous angiotensin II has been reported in almost 3000 critically ill patients with diverse types of shock. Despite unclear mortality impacts, angiotensin II seems to confer beneficial effects on several organ systems and RAS derangements, without increasing adverse events.