Takekita Yoshiteru, Suwa Taro, Yasuda Kazuyuki, Kawashima Hirotsugu, Omori Wataru, Kurimoto Naoki, Tsuboi Takashi, Noda Takamasa, Aoki Nobuatsu, Wada Ken, Inada Ken, Takebayash Minoru
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizono-Cho, Moriguchi, Osaka, 570-8506, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8397, Japan.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 12;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12991-024-00543-9.
Seizure threshold increases with age and the frequency of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Therefore, therapeutic seizures can be difficult to induce, even at maximum stimulus charge with available ECT devices. Such cases are known as difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DECs). However, no clinical guidelines exist for DECs; thus, clinicians often face difficulties determining treatment strategies. This study aimed to obtain a consensus among clinical experts regarding the treatment of DECs.
We asked Japanese ECT experts to rate 14 approaches under six conditions of DECs on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). Based on responses from 195 experts, the approaches were classified as first-line (95% confidence interval mean ≥ 6.5), second-line (mean, 3.5-6.5), or third-line strategies (mean < 3.5). Approaches rated 9 points by at least 50% of the respondents were considered "treatments of choice."
To avoid difficult seizure induction, dose reduction of benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) (8.33 ± 1.25), dose reduction or discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or other drugs that may make seizure induction difficult (8.16 ± 1.18), and ensure hyperventilation (7.95 ± 1.47) were classified as treatments of choice. First-line treatment strategies were BRZA discontinuation (7.89 ± 1.45), stimulation timing adjustment (7.00 ± 2.00), and anesthetic dose reduction (6.93 ± 1.94). Dose reduction or discontinuation of AEDs or other drugs that might make seizure induction difficult and ensure hyperventilation were the treatments of choice across all patient conditions. The results of rating approaches for patients with mood disorders and schizophrenia were similar, with differences observed among the approaches for patients with catatonia, high risk of cognitive impairment, and cardiovascular events.
ECT expert recommendations are useful and can assist in clinical decision-making. Our results suggest that while some strategies are applicable across all conditions, others should be tailored to meet the specific needs of patients. These recommendations should be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
癫痫发作阈值会随着年龄和电休克治疗(ECT)频率的增加而升高。因此,即使使用现有的ECT设备以最大刺激电量进行治疗,也可能难以诱发治疗性癫痫发作。此类病例被称为难诱发癫痫发作的电休克治疗病例(DECs)。然而,目前尚无针对DECs的临床指南;因此,临床医生在确定治疗策略时常常面临困难。本研究旨在就DECs的治疗在临床专家中达成共识。
我们让日本的ECT专家在9点李克特量表(1 =“不同意”至9 =“同意”)上对DECs六种情况下的14种方法进行评分。根据195位专家的回复,这些方法被分为一线(95%置信区间均值≥6.5)、二线(均值,3.5 - 6.5)或三线策略(均值<3.5)。至少50%的受访者将其评为9分的方法被视为“首选治疗方法”。
为避免癫痫发作诱导困难,苯二氮䓬受体激动剂(BZRA)减量(8.33±1.25)、抗癫痫药物(AEDs)或其他可能使癫痫发作诱导困难的药物减量或停用(8.16±1.18)以及确保过度换气(7.95±1.47)被列为首选治疗方法。一线治疗策略包括停用BZRA(7.89±1.45)、调整刺激时机(7.00±2.00)和降低麻醉剂量(6.93±1.94)。AEDs或其他可能使癫痫发作诱导困难的药物减量或停用以及确保过度换气是所有患者情况下的首选治疗方法。心境障碍和精神分裂症患者的方法评分结果相似,而紧张症、认知障碍高风险和心血管事件患者的方法之间存在差异。
ECT专家的建议很有用,有助于临床决策。我们的结果表明,虽然一些策略适用于所有情况,但其他策略应根据患者的具体需求进行调整。这些建议应在未来的临床研究中进一步评估。