• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中残端闭合方法的比较:Hem-o-Lok夹与腹腔镜钛夹
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized trial.不同形式的阑尾根部闭合方式对腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2295-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5924-z. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Handmade Loop Versus Hem-o-Lok Clip in Closure of Appendiceal Stump During Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Limited Setting in a Peripheral University Hospital.手工环扎与Hem-o-Lok 夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端闭合的比较:在一家边缘大学医院的有限环境下。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Sep;34(9):822-828. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0132. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Comparison of three different methods for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: Endoloop, Hem-o-lok clip, and endostapler.比较三种不同方法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中关闭残端:Endoloop、Hem-o-lok 夹和内镜吻合器。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Nov;30(11):795-801. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.76353.
5
The use of a single Hem-o-lok clip in securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用单个Hem-o-lok夹固定阑尾根部。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):85-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0348. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
6
Reliability of Hem-o-Lok clip in laparoscopic appendectomy is an uncharted territory.Hem-o-Lok夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的可靠性是一个未知领域。
Ann Ital Chir. 2022;93:711-715.
7
Two different methods for appendiceal stump closure: metal clip and Hem-o-lok clip.两种不同的阑尾残端闭合方法:金属夹和Hem-o-lok夹。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Aug;24(8):571-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0543. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.Hem-o-lok 塑料夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中固定阑尾根部。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2851-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0493-4. Epub 2009 May 14.
9
Single versus double Hem-o-lok clips to secure the apendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized multicentric clinical trial.单枚Hem-o-lok 夹与双枚 Hem-o-lok 夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中夹闭阑尾残端的前瞻性随机多中心临床试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 8;409(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03281-4.
10
Hand-made Extracorporeal Knotting versus Hem-o-Lok Clip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中手工体外打结与Hem-o-Lok夹用于残端闭合的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Dec;29(12):1203-1206. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.12.1203.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of laser acupuncture on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after acute appendicitis surgery: A retrospective clinical study.激光针刺对急性阑尾炎手术后患者胃肠功能恢复的影响:一项回顾性临床研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):105897. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105897.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of hem-o-lok clips for laparoscopic appendectomy in children: retrospective analysis and comparison to ligature loop and endoscopic surgical stapler.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术中Hem-o-lok夹的应用:回顾性分析及与结扎环和内镜手术吻合器的比较
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul 25;6:44. doi: 10.21037/tgh-20-213. eCollection 2021.
2
A randomized clinical trial of technical modifications of appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎时阑尾残端闭合技术改良的随机临床试验
BMC Surg. 2021 May 31;21(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01279-z.
3
Endostapler vs Endoloop closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: Which has better outcomes?腔镜阑尾切除术中钉合器与肠线环结扎阑尾残端:哪种方法效果更好?
Am J Surg. 2021 Aug;222(2):413-416. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.047. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
4
Closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: A systematic review of the literature.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端的闭合:文献系统综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Aug 4;57:228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.058. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Hem-o-lok clips versus intracorporeal knotting for the closure of the appendix stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用Hem-o-lok夹与体内打结法闭合阑尾残端的前瞻性随机研究
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 May;26(3):384-388. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.02248.
6
Comparison of methods for closure of appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: Single surgeon experience.使用内镜圈套器在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中闭合阑尾残端的方法比较:单术者经验
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019 Nov;25(6):616-621. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.63249.
7
Closure methods of the appendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端并发症的闭合方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 13;11(11):CD006437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006437.pub3.
8
The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized trial.不同形式的阑尾根部闭合方式对腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2295-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5924-z. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Absorbable polymeric surgical clips for appendicular stump closure: A randomized control trial of laparoscopic appendectomy with lapro-clips.用于阑尾残端闭合的可吸收聚合物外科夹:腹腔镜阑尾切除术使用lapro夹的随机对照试验。
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 5;7(27):41265-41273. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9283.
10
Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump.不同阑尾残端闭合技术应用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术后结果的比较。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jan 6;11:4. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0060-3. eCollection 2016.

腹腔镜阑尾切除术中残端闭合方法的比较:Hem-o-Lok夹与腹腔镜钛夹

Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip.

作者信息

Uçar Mehmet, Bulut Aziz

机构信息

Bingöl State Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Bingöl/Turkey (Dr. Uçar).

Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Gaziantep/Turkey. (Dr. Bulut).

出版信息

JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029
PMID:39801729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11723334/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy for acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal surgery. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries are performed with different techniques. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a widespread method due to its advantages. The aim of this study is to compare the complications, surgery time, hospitalization length, and cost-effectiveness of titanium clips and hem-o-lok clips for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

This study included 187 patients who were operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis at our hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. The patients' follow-up for 30 days after surgery was evaluated. The data of 179 patients in whom titanium and hem-o-lok clips were inserted during an appendectomy were included in the study.

RESULTS

Between April 2019 and June 2022, 179 patients were included in the study retrospectively. When the correlation between complications and surgical methods was analyzed, 98.8% of the hem-o-lok clip group and 99% of the titanium clip group had no complications. No statistically significant difference was observed between complications and surgery type ( > .05). In the hem-o-lok and titanium clip groups, the operative time was 52.4 minutes and 53.1 minutes, and the hospitalization times were 1.7 days and 1.8 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that the use of titanium clips that completely close the root of the appendix is as safe, accessible, feasible, practical, and effective as the hem-o-lok clip method. It was observed to be used safely as an alternative to other appendix root closure methods.

摘要

背景

急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术是最常见的急性腹部手术。开放和腹腔镜阑尾切除术采用不同的技术进行。由于其优点,腹腔镜阑尾切除术已成为一种广泛应用的方法。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用钛夹和Hem-o-lok夹进行残端闭合的并发症、手术时间、住院时间和成本效益。

方法

本研究纳入了2019年4月至2022年6月期间在我院接受腹腔镜急性阑尾炎手术的187例患者。对患者术后30天的随访情况进行评估。本研究纳入了179例在阑尾切除术中使用钛夹和Hem-o-lok夹的患者的数据。

结果

2019年4月至2022年6月期间,对179例患者进行了回顾性研究。分析并发症与手术方法之间的相关性时,Hem-o-lok夹组98.8%和钛夹组99%无并发症。并发症与手术类型之间未观察到统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。在Hem-o-lok夹组和钛夹组中,手术时间分别为52.4分钟和53.1分钟,住院时间分别为1.7天和1.8天。

结论

得出的结论是,使用能完全闭合阑尾根部的钛夹与Hem-o-lok夹方法一样安全、便捷、可行、实用且有效。观察发现其作为阑尾根部闭合的其他方法的替代方法可安全使用。