• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用CBCT分析对ProTaper Next和XP-endo Shaper系统的根管输送和根管中心化进行比较评估:一项体外研究。

Comparative Evaluation of Canal Transport and Centralization Between ProTaper Next and XP-endo Shaper Systems Using CBCT Analysis: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Karkehabadi Hamed, Shokri Abbas, Banitalebi Negar, Abbasi Roshanak

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental Research Center, Avicenna Institute of Clinical Sciences, Avicenna Health Research Institute, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Dental Implants Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2025 Jan 4;2025:7245596. doi: 10.1155/ijod/7245596. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/ijod/7245596
PMID:39801839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11724729/
Abstract

This study compared the apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper Next (PTN) and XP-endo Shaper (XPS) nickel titanium (NiTi) rotary files in curved root canals using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The current in vitro study involved the mesiobuccal canals of mesial roots in 44 extracted mandibular first molars that exhibited apical curvature ranging from 10° to 30°. Two experimental groups were randomly formed from the teeth ( = 22) and subjected to instrumentation with PTN and XPS. CBCT scans were performed before and after instrumentation on the teeth, and the apical transport and centering ratio were calculated at 3, 4, and 5 mm from the apex. Group comparisons were conducted using an independent -test with a significance level set at alpha = 0.05. Comparisons within groups did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the magnitude of canal transportation in the buccolingual (BL) and mesiodistal (MD) directions at any level from the apex, neither in the XPS group nor in the PTN group ( > 0.05). Canal transportation in both BL and MD directions was significantly greater in PTN than in XPS ( < 0.05). The centering ratio in the MD and BL directions was the same at 3, 4, and 5 mm from the apex in the PTN ( > 0.05) and also in the XPS ( > 0.05) groups. The centering ratio was significantly higher in XPS than in PTN ( < 0.05) except at 5 mm from the apex in the MD direction and 4 and 5 mm from the apex in the BL direction ( > 0.05). Both buccolingually and mesiodistally, PTN led to greater apical transport than XPS and also showed a lower centering ratio.

摘要

本研究使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)比较了ProTaper Next(PTN)和XP-endo Shaper(XPS)镍钛(NiTi)旋转锉在弯曲根管中的根尖移位和定心率。当前的体外研究涉及44颗拔除的下颌第一磨牙近中根的近中颊根管,这些根管呈现出10°至30°的根尖弯曲。从这些牙齿中随机形成两个实验组(每组n = 22),并分别使用PTN和XPS进行根管预备。在牙齿预备前后进行CBCT扫描,并在距根尖3、4和5毫米处计算根尖移位和定心率。组间比较采用独立t检验,显著性水平设定为α = 0.05。组内比较未发现XPS组和PTN组在距根尖任何水平的颊舌(BL)和近远中(MD)方向根管移位幅度上有任何统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。PTN组在BL和MD方向的根管移位均显著大于XPS组(P < 0.05)。在PTN组(P > 0.05)和XPS组(P > 0.05)中,距根尖3、4和5毫米处MD和BL方向的定心率相同。除了在MD方向距根尖5毫米处以及BL方向距根尖4和5毫米处(P > 0.05),XPS组的定心率显著高于PTN组(P < 0.05)。在颊舌向和近远中向,PTN均比XPS导致更大的根尖移位,并且定心率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/b68e6bd60b73/IJD2025-7245596.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/0defc1d80a0e/IJD2025-7245596.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/7c80cdd8247e/IJD2025-7245596.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/5ae8715c520f/IJD2025-7245596.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/b68e6bd60b73/IJD2025-7245596.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/0defc1d80a0e/IJD2025-7245596.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/7c80cdd8247e/IJD2025-7245596.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/5ae8715c520f/IJD2025-7245596.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c5/11724729/b68e6bd60b73/IJD2025-7245596.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Canal Transport and Centralization Between ProTaper Next and XP-endo Shaper Systems Using CBCT Analysis: An In Vitro Study.使用CBCT分析对ProTaper Next和XP-endo Shaper系统的根管输送和根管中心化进行比较评估:一项体外研究。
Int J Dent. 2025 Jan 4;2025:7245596. doi: 10.1155/ijod/7245596. eCollection 2025.
2
Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.锥形束 CT 分析 ProTaper 和 XP-endo Shaper NiTi 机用镍钛锉在弯曲根管中根尖偏移和根管中心定位比:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 25;21(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01617-w.
3
Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Shaping Ability of XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Next in Large Root Canals.根管形态对根管预备效果的影响
J Endod. 2020 Mar;46(3):437-443. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.014. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
Evaluation of the Root Canal Centering Ratio and Canal Transportation Associated With Three Rotary File Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Analysis.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析评估三种旋转锉系统相关的根管就位率和根管偏移情况。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71117. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability in Curved Mesiobuccal Canals of Mandibular First Molars after Instrumentation with Different File Systems-An Study.不同锉系统预备后下颌第一磨牙近中颊根弯曲根管根管偏移和根管居中能力的比较评价——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1211-S1214. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_157_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.评估使用和不使用引导通路时,ProTaper Next器械相关的根管偏移、定心率和剩余牙本质厚度。
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2053-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Canal Transportation and Centering Ability in Long Oval Canals: A Multidimentional Analysis.长椭圆形根管的根管输送和定位能力:多维分析。
J Endod. 2019 Oct;45(10):1242-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Analysis of Shaping Abilities of Rotary File Systems in Oval Canals with Moderate Root Curvature: A Randomized Controlled Study.中度根管弯曲椭圆形根管中旋转锉系统成形能力的分析:一项随机对照研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Apr 1;24(4):221-227. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3471.
9
[Comparative study of two novel nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation in curved canals on shaping ability and microcrack formation].两种新型镍钛器械用于弯曲根管根管预备时的成形能力及微裂纹形成的对比研究
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2023 Jun;32(3):225-229.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估 Protaper、Mtwo、WaveOne 和 Reciproc 根管预备器械的根管定位能力:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):589-592. Print 2022 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of different intracanal posts and exposure parameters on detection of vertical root fractures by cone-beam computed tomography.不同根管内桩和曝光参数对锥形束计算机断层扫描检测垂直根折的影响。
Aust Endod J. 2023 Sep;49 Suppl 1:132-145. doi: 10.1111/aej.12700. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Shaping outcome of ProTaper NEXT for root canal preparation in mandibular incisors: a micro-CT study.ProTaper NEXT 在磨牙根管预备中的成形效果:一项 micro-CT 研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02335-7.
3
Impact of several NiTi-thermally treated instrumentation systems on biomechanical preparation of curved root canals in extracted mandibular molars.
几种 NiTi 热处理器械系统对下颌磨牙弯曲根管生物力学预备的影响。
Int Endod J. 2022 Jan;55(1):124-136. doi: 10.1111/iej.13649. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
4
Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.锥形束 CT 分析 ProTaper 和 XP-endo Shaper NiTi 机用镍钛锉在弯曲根管中根尖偏移和根管中心定位比:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 25;21(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01617-w.
5
Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment and Comparative Study of the Shaping Ability of 6 Nickel-Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study.微计算机断层扫描评估及 6 种镍钛锉成形能力的比较研究:一项体外研究。
J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):812-819. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.021. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Micro-computed Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 5 Rotary and Reciprocating Systems with Different Metallurgical Properties and Surface Treatments in Curved Root Canals.不同冶金性能和表面处理的 5 种旋转和往复式根管器械在弯曲根管中的根管偏移和根管中心定位能力的微计算机评估。
J Endod. 2021 Mar;47(3):477-484. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Canal Transportation and Centring Ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue With or Without Use of Glide Path Instruments: A CBCT Study.往复式和往复式蓝锉是否使用导丝在根管运输和中心定位能力上的锥形束 CT 研究。
Eur Endod J. 2020 May 14;5(2):118-122. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.86570. eCollection 2020.
8
Assessment of Mechanical Root Canal Preparation with Centric Reciprocating or Eccentric Rotary Kinematics: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study.同心往复或偏心旋转运动学下的机械根管预备评估:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Endod. 2020 Sep;46(9):1309-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Apical Transportation of Mesiobuccal Canals of Maxillary Molars Following Root Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems and Hand Files: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment.使用两种旋转系统和手动锉进行根管预备后上颌磨牙近中颊根管的根尖移位:锥形束计算机断层扫描评估
Front Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):272-278. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i4.2086. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 4 Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Systems.应用微计算机断层扫描评价 4 种镍钛根管预备器械的根管偏移和根管中心定位能力。
J Endod. 2020 May;46(5):675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Mar 11.