Gottlieb B H
Health Educ Q. 1985 Spring;12(1):5-22. doi: 10.1177/109019818501200102.
Following a brief overview of the stressful life events-illness model and its implications for intervention, this article highlights the role of social support as a resource for resisting stress-induced illness and disability. It identifies three different connotative meanings that have been assigned to the social support construct, and describes their empirical operationalizations in several recent studies. Specifically, the social integration/participation formulation, the social network approach, and the social intimacy measurement strategy are described and contrasted. Within the latter approach, one study that illuminated types of informal helping behaviors is discussed in greater detail. A review of possible mechanisms whereby social support accomplishes its health-protective impact is also offered, and two types of planned interventions involving the mobilization or optimization of social support are spotlighted. The article concludes with ideas about ways that professionals can safeguard the natural helping skills of citizens and achieve an appropriate balance between formal and informal systems of service delivery in the health and human services fields.
在简要概述压力性生活事件 - 疾病模型及其对干预的影响之后,本文强调了社会支持作为抵御压力诱发疾病和残疾资源的作用。它确定了赋予社会支持结构的三种不同内涵意义,并描述了它们在最近几项研究中的实证操作化。具体而言,描述并对比了社会整合/参与表述、社会网络方法和社会亲密测量策略。在后者的方法中,更详细地讨论了一项阐明非正式帮助行为类型的研究。还提供了对社会支持实现其健康保护影响的可能机制的综述,并突出了两种涉及调动或优化社会支持的计划干预措施。文章最后提出了一些想法,即专业人员如何能够维护公民的自然帮助技能,并在健康和人类服务领域的正式和非正式服务提供系统之间实现适当的平衡。