Ma Shizhou, Mistry Purbasha, Badiou Pascal, Bansal Sheel, Creed Irena F
School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada.
Ducks Unlimited Canada, Stonewall, MB Canada.
Wetlands (Wilmington). 2025;45(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s13157-024-01893-6. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
There are increasing global efforts and initiatives aiming to tackle climate change and mitigate its impacts via natural climate solutions (NCS). Wetlands have been considered effective NCS given their capacity to sequester and retain atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO) while also providing a myriad of other ecosystem functions that can assist in mitigating the impacts of climate change. However, wetlands have a dual impact on climate, influencing the atmospheric concentrations of both CO and methane (CH). The cooling effect associated with wetland CO sequestration can be counterbalanced by the warming effect caused by CH emissions from wetlands. The relative ability of wetlands to sequester CO versus emit CH is dependent on a suite of interacting physical, chemical, and biological factors, making it difficult to determine if/which wetlands are considered important NCS. The fact that wetlands are embedded in landscapes with surface and subsurface hydrological connections to other wetlands (i.e., wetlandscapes) that flow over and through geochemically active soils and sediments adds a new layer of complexity and poses further challenges to understanding wetland carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes at large spatial scales. Our review demonstrates how additional scientific advances are required to understand the driving mechanisms associated with wetland carbon cycling under different environmental conditions. It is vital to understand wetland functionality at both wetland and wetlandscape scales to effectively implement wetlands as NCS to maximize ecological, social, and economic benefits.
全球正加大努力并采取更多举措,旨在通过自然气候解决方案(NCS)应对气候变化并减轻其影响。湿地因其能够封存和保留大气中的二氧化碳(CO),同时还能提供众多有助于减轻气候变化影响的其他生态系统功能,而被视为有效的自然气候解决方案。然而,湿地对气候有双重影响,会影响大气中CO和甲烷(CH)的浓度。湿地CO封存带来的降温效应可能会被湿地CH排放造成的升温效应所抵消。湿地封存CO与排放CH的相对能力取决于一系列相互作用的物理、化学和生物因素,这使得难以确定哪些湿地被视为重要的自然气候解决方案。湿地与其他湿地(即湿地景观)在地表和地下存在水文联系,且水流经过地球化学活跃的土壤和沉积物,这一事实增加了新的复杂性,也给在大空间尺度上理解湿地碳封存和温室气体通量带来了进一步挑战。我们的综述表明,需要更多科学进展来理解不同环境条件下与湿地碳循环相关的驱动机制。为了有效地将湿地作为自然气候解决方案加以实施,以实现最大的生态、社会和经济效益,了解湿地和湿地景观尺度上的湿地功能至关重要。