de Souza Daniele Tubino, Hommes Lena, Wals Arjen, Hoogesteger Jaime, Boelens Rutgerd, Duarte-Abadía Bibiana, Hidalgo-Bastidas Juan Pablo, Huijbens Edward, Harris Leila M, Suhardiman Diana, Melsen Lieke, Buijse Tom, de Castro Fabio, Cremers Leontien, Hogenboom Barbara, Garcia Vargas Mariela, Roca-Servat Denisse, Veldwisch Gert Jan, Joy K J
Water Resources Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Department of Geography & Institute of the Environment, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Local Environ. 2024 Nov 19;30(1):58-80. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215. eCollection 2025.
This paper develops the methodological concept of river co-learning arenas (RCAs) and explores their potential to strengthen innovative grassroots river initiatives, enliven river commons, regenerate river ecologies, and foster greater socio-ecological justice. The integrity of river systems has been threatened in profound ways over the last century. Pollution, damming, canalisation, and water grabbing are some examples of pressures threatening the entwined lifeworlds of human and non-human communities that depend on riverine systems. Finding ways to reverse the trends of environmental degradation demands complex spatial-temporal, political, and institutional articulations across different levels of governance (from local to global) and among a plurality of actors who operate from diverse spheres of knowledge and systems of practice, and who have distinct capacities to affect decision-making. In this context, grassroots river initiatives worldwide use new multi-actor and multi-level dialogue arenas to develop proposals for river regeneration and promote social-ecological justice in opposition to dominant technocratic-hydraulic development strategies. This paper conceptualises these spaces of dialogue and action as RCAs and critically reflects on ways of organising and supporting RCAs while facilitating their cross-fertilisation in transdisciplinary practice. By integrating studies, debates, and theories from diverse disciplines, we generate multi-faceted insights and present cornerstones for the engagement with and/or enaction of RCAs. This encompasses five main themes central to RCAs: (1) River knowledge encounters and truth regimes, (2) transgressive co-learning, (3) confrontation and collaboration dynamics, (4) ongoing reflexivity, (5) transcultural knowledge assemblages and translocal bridging of rooted knowledge.
本文提出了河流共同学习场域(RCAs)的方法概念,并探讨了它们在加强基层创新河流倡议、激活河流公地、恢复河流生态以及促进更大的社会生态正义方面的潜力。在过去的一个世纪里,河流系统的完整性受到了深刻的威胁。污染、筑坝、河道化和水资源掠夺是一些压力的例子,这些压力威胁着依赖河流系统的人类和非人类社区相互交织的生活世界。找到扭转环境退化趋势的方法需要在不同治理层面(从地方到全球)以及众多行为者之间进行复杂的时空、政治和制度协调,这些行为者来自不同的知识领域和实践体系,并且具有不同的影响决策的能力。在这种背景下,全球的基层河流倡议利用新的多行为者和多层次对话场域,针对河流恢复提出建议,并反对占主导地位的技术官僚 - 水利发展战略,促进社会生态正义。本文将这些对话和行动空间概念化为河流共同学习场域,并批判性地思考组织和支持河流共同学习场域的方式,同时促进它们在跨学科实践中的交叉融合。通过整合来自不同学科的研究、辩论和理论,我们产生了多方面的见解,并提出了参与和/或实施河流共同学习场域的基石。这包括河流共同学习场域的五个主要主题:(1)河流知识相遇与真理制度,(2)越界共同学习,(3)对抗与合作动态,(4)持续反思,(5)跨文化知识组合与扎根知识的跨地方衔接。