• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
River co-learning arenas: principles and practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-creation and multi-scalar (inter)action.河流共同学习场域:跨学科知识共同创造与多尺度(交互)行动的原则与实践
Local Environ. 2024 Nov 19;30(1):58-80. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215. eCollection 2025.
2
Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice.河流社区:社会自然共同管理的政治生态与争取水正义的跨地区斗争。
J Peasant Stud. 2022 Nov 15;50(3):1125-1156. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810. eCollection 2023.
3
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.
4
Organising a safe space for navigating social-ecological transformations to sustainability.为引导社会生态转型实现可持续发展构建一个安全空间。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 May 28;12(6):6027-44. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606027.
5
Co-producing uncomfortable, transdisciplinary, actionable knowledges against the corporate food regime through critical science approaches.通过批判性科学方法共同生成针对企业食品体系的令人不安的、跨学科的、可付诸行动的知识。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023 May 23:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03377-9.
6
River basin governance enabling pathways for sustainable management: A comparative study between Australia, Brazil, China and France.流域治理促进可持续管理的途径:澳大利亚、巴西、中国和法国的比较研究。
Ambio. 2022 Aug;51(8):1871-1888. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01699-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
Understanding enabling capacities for managing the 'wicked problem' of nonpoint source water pollution in catchments: a conceptual framework.理解流域中非点源水污染“棘手问题”管理的使能能力:一个概念框架。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:441-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
8
Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.利用社会环境报告卡作为跨学科合作的工具。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Jun;16(4):494-507. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4243. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
A Pluralistic Perspective on Research in Psychotherapy: Harnessing Passion, Difference and Dialogue to Promote Justice and Relevance.心理治疗研究的多元视角:利用热情、差异与对话促进公正与相关性
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 6;12:742676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742676. eCollection 2021.
10
Systems approaches for localising the SDGs: co-production of place-based case studies.系统方法定位可持续发展目标:基于地点的案例研究的共同制定。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0527-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice.河流社区:社会自然共同管理的政治生态与争取水正义的跨地区斗争。
J Peasant Stud. 2022 Nov 15;50(3):1125-1156. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810. eCollection 2023.
2
Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management.理解河流及其社会关系:推进环境水管理的关键一步。
WIREs Water. 2019;6(6). doi: 10.1002/wat2.1381.
3
Seeing a global web of connected systems.看到一个相互连接的系统的全球网络。
Science. 2018 Dec 21;362(6421):1357. doi: 10.1126/science.aav8478.
4
Introduction.引言。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):450-5. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12689. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
5
Modifying Photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research.为基于社区的参与式原住民研究修改照片声音法。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.030. Epub 2008 Jan 8.

河流共同学习场域:跨学科知识共同创造与多尺度(交互)行动的原则与实践

River co-learning arenas: principles and practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-creation and multi-scalar (inter)action.

作者信息

de Souza Daniele Tubino, Hommes Lena, Wals Arjen, Hoogesteger Jaime, Boelens Rutgerd, Duarte-Abadía Bibiana, Hidalgo-Bastidas Juan Pablo, Huijbens Edward, Harris Leila M, Suhardiman Diana, Melsen Lieke, Buijse Tom, de Castro Fabio, Cremers Leontien, Hogenboom Barbara, Garcia Vargas Mariela, Roca-Servat Denisse, Veldwisch Gert Jan, Joy K J

机构信息

Water Resources Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Department of Geography & Institute of the Environment, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Local Environ. 2024 Nov 19;30(1):58-80. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215
PMID:39802485
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11716650/
Abstract

This paper develops the methodological concept of river co-learning arenas (RCAs) and explores their potential to strengthen innovative grassroots river initiatives, enliven river commons, regenerate river ecologies, and foster greater socio-ecological justice. The integrity of river systems has been threatened in profound ways over the last century. Pollution, damming, canalisation, and water grabbing are some examples of pressures threatening the entwined lifeworlds of human and non-human communities that depend on riverine systems. Finding ways to reverse the trends of environmental degradation demands complex spatial-temporal, political, and institutional articulations across different levels of governance (from local to global) and among a plurality of actors who operate from diverse spheres of knowledge and systems of practice, and who have distinct capacities to affect decision-making. In this context, grassroots river initiatives worldwide use new multi-actor and multi-level dialogue arenas to develop proposals for river regeneration and promote social-ecological justice in opposition to dominant technocratic-hydraulic development strategies. This paper conceptualises these spaces of dialogue and action as RCAs and critically reflects on ways of organising and supporting RCAs while facilitating their cross-fertilisation in transdisciplinary practice. By integrating studies, debates, and theories from diverse disciplines, we generate multi-faceted insights and present cornerstones for the engagement with and/or enaction of RCAs. This encompasses five main themes central to RCAs: (1) River knowledge encounters and truth regimes, (2) transgressive co-learning, (3) confrontation and collaboration dynamics, (4) ongoing reflexivity, (5) transcultural knowledge assemblages and translocal bridging of rooted knowledge.

摘要

本文提出了河流共同学习场域(RCAs)的方法概念,并探讨了它们在加强基层创新河流倡议、激活河流公地、恢复河流生态以及促进更大的社会生态正义方面的潜力。在过去的一个世纪里,河流系统的完整性受到了深刻的威胁。污染、筑坝、河道化和水资源掠夺是一些压力的例子,这些压力威胁着依赖河流系统的人类和非人类社区相互交织的生活世界。找到扭转环境退化趋势的方法需要在不同治理层面(从地方到全球)以及众多行为者之间进行复杂的时空、政治和制度协调,这些行为者来自不同的知识领域和实践体系,并且具有不同的影响决策的能力。在这种背景下,全球的基层河流倡议利用新的多行为者和多层次对话场域,针对河流恢复提出建议,并反对占主导地位的技术官僚 - 水利发展战略,促进社会生态正义。本文将这些对话和行动空间概念化为河流共同学习场域,并批判性地思考组织和支持河流共同学习场域的方式,同时促进它们在跨学科实践中的交叉融合。通过整合来自不同学科的研究、辩论和理论,我们产生了多方面的见解,并提出了参与和/或实施河流共同学习场域的基石。这包括河流共同学习场域的五个主要主题:(1)河流知识相遇与真理制度,(2)越界共同学习,(3)对抗与合作动态,(4)持续反思,(5)跨文化知识组合与扎根知识的跨地方衔接。