Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab, arterial chemoembolization, and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Although the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A+B) shows promise for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its response rate is still inadequate. Previous studies indicate that the integration of FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is advantageous for the management of HCC. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the A+B+TACE or HAIC therapy protocol in patients with advanced HCC.

METHOD

We collected pertinent studies from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, all published prior to August 1, 2024. We used Stata MP 14.0 software for data analysis, incorporating data extraction and quality assessment procedures.

RESULTS

Data synthesis employed a fixed-effects model in certain contexts and a random-effects model where significant variability was present. A total of 405 patients were involved over ten trials. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 57.2% (95% CI, 46.9-67.6%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 85.9% (95% CI, 82.0-89.7%), as determined by the modified response assessment criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). The rates for complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were 10.8% (95% CI, 5.0-16.6%) and 45.5% (95% CI, 38.0-53.0%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10.9 months, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 8.0 to 13.8. 91.0% (95% CI: 84.9-97.1%) of patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any severity during therapy, with 24.8% (95% CI: 8.8-40.9%) reporting AEs of grade 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

The A+B+TACE-HAIC therapy demonstrates promising efficacy and tolerance for the management of advanced HCC.