同步野生型转移性结直肠癌患者 upfront 原发性肿瘤切除的结局
Outcomes of upfront primary tumor resection in patients with synchronous wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
作者信息
Chen Po-Jung, Chen Chou-Chen, Chang Shih-Ching, Chang Yu-Yao, Lin Bo-Wen, Chen Hong-Hwa, Hsieh Yao-Yu, Hsu Hung-Chih, Hsieh Meng-Che, Ke Tao-Wei, Kuan Feng-Che, Wu Chih-Chien, Lu Wei-Chen, Su Yu-Li, Liang Yi-Hsin, Chen Joe-Bin, Huang Shuan-Yuan, Huang Ching-Wen, Wang Jaw-Yuan
机构信息
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
出版信息
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):5863-5873. doi: 10.62347/DLWI1455. eCollection 2024.
This multicenter study explored the survival benefits of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy in real-world patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment options for mCRC include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. The efficacy of upfront PTR in managing mCRC remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of upfront PTR in 582 patients with synchronous wild-type mCRC who received cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment between November 2016 and August 2020. Of these patients, 364 (62.5%) underwent upfront PTR (PTR group) and 218 (37.5%) did not (non-PTR group). Relevant data were collected from 14 medical institutions in Taiwan. No significant differences were discovered between the PTR and non-PTR groups in median overall survival (37.9 vs. 31.7 months; = 0.079) or progression-free survival (13.70 vs. 13.29 months; = 0.62). Compared with patients who did not undergo metastasectomy, those who underwent this surgery exhibited significantly longer median overall survival (29.2 vs. 54.18 months; < 0.001) and progression-free survival (12.8 vs. 15.60 months; = 0.013). Our findings suggest that upfront PTR may not improve oncological outcomes in patients with synchronous wild-type mCRC. Cetuximab-based targeted therapy plus chemotherapy appears to be suitable as first-line treatment for these patients. This study indicates that upfront PTR should be considered only for patients exhibiting symptoms such as tumor bleeding, perforation, or obstruction.
这项多中心研究探讨了在现实世界中野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中,先行原发性肿瘤切除术(PTR)然后接受一线西妥昔单抗联合化疗的生存获益。mCRC的治疗选择包括化疗、靶向治疗、免疫治疗和手术。先行PTR治疗mCRC的疗效仍不明确。在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了2016年11月至2020年8月期间接受西妥昔单抗联合化疗作为一线治疗的582例同步野生型mCRC患者先行PTR的结果。在这些患者中,364例(62.5%)接受了先行PTR(PTR组),218例(37.5%)未接受(非PTR组)。相关数据来自台湾的14家医疗机构。PTR组和非PTR组在中位总生存期(37.9个月对31.7个月;P = 0.079)或无进展生存期(13.70个月对13.29个月;P = 0.62)方面未发现显著差异。与未接受转移灶切除术的患者相比,接受该手术的患者中位总生存期(29.2个月对54.18个月;P < 0.001)和无进展生存期(12.8个月对15.60个月;P = 0.013)明显更长。我们的研究结果表明,先行PTR可能无法改善同步野生型mCRC患者的肿瘤学结局。基于西妥昔单抗的靶向治疗联合化疗似乎适合作为这些患者的一线治疗。这项研究表明,仅对出现肿瘤出血、穿孔或梗阻等症状的患者应考虑先行PTR。