Ramirez Iago, Reis Caio Luiz Bitencourt, Madalena Isabela Ribeiro, Filho Flares Baratto, Oliveira Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes, Antunes Leonardo Santos, Antunes Lívia Azeredo Alves, Kirschneck Christian, Küchler Erika Calvano, Oliveira Daniela Silva Barroso de
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 13;29(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06035-0.
To perform a systematic review to investigate if the use of audio distraction reduces signs of stress and anxiety in paediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.
Search was made in electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Scielo, BVS, Springer Link, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and grey literature) until March 11th, 2024. The eligibility criteria were: paediatric patients under dental treatment; use of audio as a distraction method; comparison between groups with and without use of audio distraction; Clinical trials. The outcomes measured were alterations in the anxiety, fear and/or stress levels. Evaluation of the risk of bias and assessment of the certainty of the evidence (GRADE) were performed. Meta-analysis was conducted for four outcomes, considering 95% confidence interval (CI), random effects and heterogeneity from Tau².
From 5,495 results, 25 studies composed the narrative sample and 12 composed the meta-analysis. High risk of bias was generally observed. Three results from the meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity and some outcomes presented a statistical association: systolic blood pressure reduction (p = 0.52; CI= -6.05 [-7.50 to -4.60]), pulse rate (p < 0.00001; CI= -4.95 [-9.95 to -3.52]), Venham's test scores (p < 0.00001; CI= -1.24 [-1.79 to -0.68]), and oxygen saturation (p < 0.00001; CI = 0.14 [-0.04 to 0.33]). The outcomes presented "very low" and "low" certainty of evidence.
Although a low certainty of evidence was observed, our study suggests that audio may be an effective alternative for reducing stress and anxiety and pain perception during non-invasive treatments. Future well-designed studies are necessary.
Audio distraction presents a potential role as an efficient method to reduce stress in children undergoing dental treatment. More RCTs are necessary to improve the evidence level, considering the main variables related to audio distraction.
进行一项系统评价,以调查使用音频分心法是否能减轻接受牙科治疗的儿科患者的压力和焦虑迹象。
在电子数据库(MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase、科学引文索引、Scielo、BVS、Springer Link、Science Direct、考克兰图书馆和灰色文献)中进行检索,直至2024年3月11日。纳入标准为:接受牙科治疗的儿科患者;使用音频作为分心方法;有音频分心组与无音频分心组之间的比较;临床试验。测量的结果为焦虑、恐惧和/或压力水平的变化。进行了偏倚风险评估和证据确定性(GRADE)评估。对四个结果进行了荟萃分析,考虑95%置信区间(CI)、随机效应和Tau²的异质性。
从5495个结果中,25项研究构成叙述性样本,12项构成荟萃分析。总体观察到高偏倚风险。荟萃分析的三个结果显示出高度异质性,一些结果呈现出统计学关联:收缩压降低(p = 0.52;CI = -6.05 [-7.50至-4.60])、脉搏率(p < 0.00001;CI = -4.95 [-9.95至-3.52])、韦纳姆测试分数(p < 0.00001;CI = -1.24 [-1.79至-0.68])和血氧饱和度(p < 0.00001;CI = 0.14 [-0.04至0.33])。这些结果呈现出“非常低”和“低”的证据确定性。
尽管观察到证据确定性较低,但我们的研究表明,在非侵入性治疗期间,音频可能是减轻压力、焦虑和疼痛感知的有效替代方法。未来需要设计良好的研究。
音频分心作为一种减轻接受牙科治疗儿童压力的有效方法具有潜在作用。考虑到与音频分心相关的主要变量,需要更多的随机对照试验来提高证据水平。