Ghia Darshee, Thota Pranavi, Ritchie Taylor, Rana Heli, Minhas Ranvir, Moolji Jalal, Ritchie Bruce, Adatia Adil
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0316797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316797. eCollection 2025.
Primary and secondary antibody deficiencies (PAD and SAD) are amongst the most prevalent immunodeficiency syndromes, often necessitating long-term immune globulin replacement therapy (IRT). Both intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) have demonstrated efficacy in antibody deficiency. Comparative analyses of these two routes of administration are limited to nurse-administered IVIG and home therapy with self-administered SCIG. A third programmatic approach, SCIG administered by nurses in hospital-based outpatient infusion clinics, combines certain advantages of IVIG and home SCIG such as the provision of nursing support and the reduced risk of systemic reactions associated with the subcutaneous route. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the viability and resource utilization of nurse-administered SCIG with IVIG in patients with antibody deficiency. We hypothesized that nurse-administered SCIG would require a similar amount of infusion clinic time per month as IVIG, despite more frequent dosing, due to shorter individual appointments, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Information on infusion duration, time in the infusion chair, direct nursing time, and treatment satisfaction using the Life Quality Index was collected. Time measures for each patient were expressed as minutes/4 weeks to account for the more frequent dosing of nurse-administered SCIG compared to IVIG. We determined that the total time, infusion time, and nursing time needed to provide nurse-administered SCIG was comparable to IVIG. The more frequent dosing of SCIG was offset by the shorter times required per infusion. Patients reported favorable treatment satisfaction with both nurse-administered SCIG and IVIG. We conclude that nurse-administered SCIG may be a useful treatment modality for well-selected individuals.
原发性和继发性抗体缺陷(PAD和SAD)是最常见的免疫缺陷综合征,通常需要长期免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IRT)。静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)和皮下注射免疫球蛋白(SCIG)在抗体缺陷方面均已证明有效。这两种给药途径的比较分析仅限于护士给药的IVIG和自我给药的家庭SCIG治疗。第三种方案是在医院门诊输液诊所由护士进行SCIG给药,它结合了IVIG和家庭SCIG的某些优点,如提供护理支持以及降低与皮下途径相关的全身反应风险。这项横断面研究旨在比较抗体缺陷患者中护士给药的SCIG与IVIG的可行性和资源利用情况。我们假设,尽管护士给药的SCIG给药频率更高,但由于每次就诊时间较短,每月所需的输液诊所时间与IVIG相似,同时保持较高的患者满意度。收集了有关输液持续时间、在输液椅上的时间、直接护理时间以及使用生活质量指数的治疗满意度的信息。每位患者的时间测量值以分钟/4周表示,以考虑到与IVIG相比,护士给药的SCIG给药频率更高。我们确定,提供护士给药的SCIG所需的总时间、输液时间和护理时间与IVIG相当。SCIG给药频率较高被每次输液所需的较短时间所抵消。患者对护士给药的SCIG和IVIG均报告了良好的治疗满意度。我们得出结论,对于精心挑选的个体,护士给药的SCIG可能是一种有用的治疗方式。