Foulger Liam H, Reiter Emma R, Kuo Calvin, Carpenter Mark G, Blouin Jean-Sébastien
School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0315851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315851. eCollection 2025.
Our ability to balance upright provides a stable platform to perform daily activities. Balance deficits associated with various clinical conditions may affect activities of daily living, highlighting the importance of quantifying standing balance in ecological environments. Although typically performed in laboratory settings, the growing availability of low-cost inertial measurement units (IMUs) allows the assessment of balance in the real world. However, it is unclear how many IMUs are required to adequately estimate linear displacements of the centre of mass (CoM) at stance widths associated with daily activities. While wearing IMUs on their head, sternum, back, right thigh, right shank, and left shank, 16 participants stood quietly on a force platform in narrow, hip-width, and shoulder-width stances, each for three two-minute trials. Using a multi-segment biomechanical model, we estimated CoM displacements from all possible combinations of the IMUs. We then calculated the correlation between the IMU- and force platform- CoM estimates to determine the minimal number of IMUs needed to estimate CoM sway. Four IMUs were necessary to accurately estimate anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) CoM displacements across stance widths. Using IMUs on the back, right thigh, and both shanks, we found strong correlations between the IMU CoM estimation and the force platform CoM estimation in narrow stance (AP: r = 0.92±0.04, RMSE = 2.39±2.08 mm; ML: r = 0.97±0.02, RMSE = 1.16±0.77 mm), hip-width stance (AP: r = 0.93±0.04, RMSE = 2.00±1.18 mm; ML: r = 0.92±0.06, RMSE = 0.92±0.70 mm), and shoulder-width stance (AP: r = 0.93±0.03, RMSE = 1.95±1.66 mm; ML: r = 0.86±0.13, RMSE = 1.39±1.46 mm). These results indicate that IMUs can be used to estimate CoM displacements during quiet standing and that four IMUs are necessary to do so. Using an algorithm based on a simple biomechanical model, researchers and clinicians can estimate whole-body CoM displacements accurately during unperturbed quiet standing. This approach can improve the ecological validity of standing balance research and opens the possibility for assessing/monitoring patients with standing balance deficits.
我们直立平衡的能力为进行日常活动提供了一个稳定的平台。与各种临床状况相关的平衡缺陷可能会影响日常生活活动,这凸显了在生态环境中量化站立平衡的重要性。虽然通常在实验室环境中进行,但低成本惯性测量单元(IMU)的日益普及使得在现实世界中评估平衡成为可能。然而,尚不清楚需要多少个IMU才能在与日常活动相关的站立宽度下充分估计质心(CoM)的线性位移。16名参与者在头部、胸骨、背部、右大腿、右小腿和左小腿佩戴IMU,分别以窄、臀宽和肩宽的姿势安静地站在测力平台上,每种姿势进行三次两分钟的试验。我们使用多节段生物力学模型,从IMU的所有可能组合中估计CoM位移。然后,我们计算IMU估计的CoM与测力平台估计的CoM之间的相关性,以确定估计CoM摆动所需的最少IMU数量。需要四个IMU才能准确估计不同站立宽度下质心的前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)位移。通过在背部、右大腿和双小腿使用IMU,我们发现在窄站姿(AP:r = 0.92±0.04,RMSE = 2.39±2.08 mm;ML:r = 0.97±0.02,RMSE = 1.16±0.77 mm)、臀宽站姿(AP:r = 0.93±0.04,RMSE = 2.00±1.18 mm;ML:r = 0.92±0.06,RMSE = 0.92±0.70 mm)和肩宽站姿(AP:r = 0.93±0.03,RMSE = 1.95±1.66 mm;ML:r = 0.86±0.13,RMSE = 1.39±1.46 mm)下,IMU估计的CoM与测力平台估计的CoM之间存在很强的相关性。这些结果表明,IMU可用于估计安静站立时的CoM位移,并且需要四个IMU才能做到这一点。使用基于简单生物力学模型的算法,研究人员和临床医生可以在无干扰的安静站立期间准确估计全身CoM位移。这种方法可以提高站立平衡研究的生态效度,并为评估/监测有站立平衡缺陷的患者开辟了可能性。