Tuesley Karen M, Spilsbury Katrina, Pearson Sallie-Anne, Donovan Peter, Obermair Andreas, Coory Michael D, Ali Sitwat, Pandeya Nirmala, Stewart Louise, Jordan Susan J, Webb Penelope M
School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 May 1;117(5):1046-1055. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae282.
Use of long-acting, reversible contraceptives has increased over the past 20 years, but an understanding of how they could influence cancer risk is limited.
We conducted a nested case-control study among a national cohort of Australian women (n = 176 601 diagnosed with cancer between 2004 and 2013; 882 999 matched control individuals) to investigate the associations between the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, etonogestrel implants, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and cancer risk and compared these results with the oral contraceptive pill. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system and etonogestrel implant use was associated with breast cancer risk (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.31, and OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.32, respectively), but depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate was not, except when used for 5 or more years (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.59). Reduced risks were seen for levonorgestrel intrauterine system (≥1 years of use) in endometrial cancer (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.99), ovarian cancer (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.88), and cervical cancer (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.75); for etonogestrel implant in endometrial cancer (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.34) and ovarian cancer (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.02); and for depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in endometrial cancer (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.34). Although levonorgestrel intrauterine system, etonogestrel implant and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate were all associated with increased cancer risk overall, for etonogestrel implant, the risk returned to baseline after cessation, similar to the oral contraceptive pill. We were unable to adjust for all potential confounders, but sensitivity analyses suggested that adjusting for parity, smoking, and obesity would not have materially changed our findings.
Long-acting, reversible contraceptives have similar cancer associations to the oral contraceptive pill (reduced endometrial and ovarian cancer risks and short-term increased breast cancer risk). This information may be helpful to women and their physicians when discussing contraception options.
在过去20年中,长效可逆避孕药的使用有所增加,但对于它们如何影响癌症风险的了解有限。
我们在澳大利亚女性全国队列中开展了一项巢式病例对照研究(2004年至2013年间确诊癌症的女性有176601例;匹配的对照个体有882999例),以调查左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统、依托孕烯植入剂、醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂与癌症风险之间的关联,并将这些结果与口服避孕药进行比较。我们使用条件逻辑回归来估计比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统和依托孕烯植入剂与乳腺癌风险相关(OR分别为1.26,95%CI为1.21至1.31;以及OR为1.24,95%CI为1.17至1.32),但醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂除外,除非使用5年或更长时间(OR为1.23,95%CI为0.95至1.59)。对于左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(使用≥1年),子宫内膜癌(OR为0.80,95%CI为0.65至0.99)、卵巢癌(OR为0.71,95%CI为0.57至0.88)和宫颈癌(OR为0.62,95%CI为0.51至0.75)的风险降低;对于依托孕烯植入剂,子宫内膜癌(OR为0.21,95%CI为0.13至0.34)和卵巢癌(OR为0.76,95%CI为0.57至1.02)的风险降低;对于醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂,子宫内膜癌(OR为0.21,95%CI为0.13至0.34)的风险降低。尽管左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统、依托孕烯植入剂和醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂总体上均与癌症风险增加相关,但对于依托孕烯植入剂,停药后风险恢复至基线水平,与口服避孕药类似。我们无法对所有潜在混杂因素进行调整,但敏感性分析表明,调整产次、吸烟和肥胖因素不会实质性改变我们的研究结果。
长效可逆避孕药与口服避孕药在癌症关联方面相似(降低子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌风险,短期增加乳腺癌风险)。该信息在女性及其医生讨论避孕选择时可能会有所帮助。