Kim Do H, Medeiros L Jeffrey, Xu Jie, Tang Guilin, Qiu Lianqun, Wang Sa A, Ok Chi Y, Wang Wei, Yin C Cameron, You M James, Garces Sofia, Lin Pei, Li Shaoying
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mod Pathol. 2025 May;38(5):100710. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100710. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
Classification of cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)/high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements, referred to here as BCL6 double-hit lymphoma (DHL), is controversial. We assessed 60 cases of BCL6-DHL and compared this cohort to 224 cases of DHL with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (BCL2-DHL) and 217 cases of DLBCL not otherwise specified. Compared with the DLBCL cohort, patients with BCL6-DHL had more aggressive clinical features such as frequent extranodal involvement, high-stage disease, a high International Prognostic Index score, and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level (P < .01 for all). Compared with the BCL2-DHL cohort, patients with BCL6-DHL had similarly aggressive clinical features but a lower frequency of germinal center B-cell (GCB) immunophenotype and MYC and BCL2 double expression. Patients with BCL6-DHL showed overall survival (OS) intermediate between patients with DLBCL and BCL2-DHL. Following induction with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy, patients with BCL6-DHL demonstrated poor OS similar to patients with BCL2-DHL and worse OS than that of patients with DLBCL (P = .024). However, among patients who received rituximab, etoposide phosphate, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (R-EPOCH), there was no significant difference in OS among the 3 groups (P = .146). Gene expression profiling showed that 60% of BCL6-DHL cases had a double-hit (DH)-like signature compared with 10% of DLBCL-GCB and 93% of BCL2-DHL cases. The DH-like signature in BCL6-DHL cases was associated with a GCB immunophenotype. Based on these data, we suggest that BCL6-DHL cases are clinically more aggressive than DLBCL and patients may benefit from a more aggressive therapy than R-CHOP. The data also suggest that BCL6-DHL, as currently defined, is heterogeneous and that neoplasms with a GCB immunophenotype are more likely to have a DH-like signature and behave more aggressively. Last, we suggest that BCL6-DHL cases deserve to be recognized separately in a lymphoma classification to facilitate further understanding of these neoplasms and for optimal patient management.
伴有MYC和BCL6重排的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)/高级别B细胞淋巴瘤(HGBL)病例(本文称为BCL6双打击淋巴瘤(DHL))的分类存在争议。我们评估了60例BCL6-DHL病例,并将该队列与224例伴有MYC和BCL2重排的DHL病例(BCL2-DHL)以及217例未另行指定的DLBCL病例进行比较。与DLBCL队列相比,BCL6-DHL患者具有更具侵袭性的临床特征,如频繁的结外受累、晚期疾病、高国际预后指数评分以及血清乳酸脱氢酶水平升高(所有P均<0.01)。与BCL2-DHL队列相比,BCL6-DHL患者具有相似的侵袭性临床特征,但生发中心B细胞(GCB)免疫表型以及MYC和BCL2双表达的频率较低。BCL6-DHL患者的总生存期(OS)介于DLBCL和BCL2-DHL患者之间。在接受利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)化疗诱导后,BCL6-DHL患者的OS较差,与BCL2-DHL患者相似,且比DLBCL患者更差(P = 0.024)。然而,在接受利妥昔单抗、磷酸依托泊苷、泼尼松、长春新碱、环磷酰胺和阿霉素(R-EPOCH)治疗的患者中,三组之间的OS无显著差异(P = 0.146)。基因表达谱分析显示,60%的BCL6-DHL病例具有双打击(DH)样特征,而DLBCL-GCB病例为10%,BCL2-DHL病例为93%。BCL6-DHL病例中的DH样特征与GCB免疫表型相关。基于这些数据,我们认为BCL6-DHL病例在临床上比DLBCL更具侵袭性,患者可能从比R-CHOP更积极的治疗中获益。数据还表明,目前定义的BCL6-DHL是异质性的,具有GCB免疫表型的肿瘤更可能具有DH样特征且行为更具侵袭性。最后,我们建议在淋巴瘤分类中应单独识别BCL6-DHL病例,以促进对这些肿瘤的进一步了解并实现最佳的患者管理。