• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领先制药公司研发成功率的基准分析:对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)2006年至2022年批准情况的实证分析

Benchmarking R&D success rates of leading pharmaceutical companies: an empirical analysis of FDA approvals (2006-2022).

作者信息

Schuhmacher Alexander, Hinder Markus, Brief Elazar, Gassmann Oliver, Hartl Dominik

机构信息

Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Germany; University of St Gallen, Switzerland.

Novartis, Basel, Switzerland; University of Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Drug Discov Today. 2025 Feb;30(2):104291. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104291. Epub 2025 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104291
PMID:39805539
Abstract

Previous analyses provide an industry benchmark of ∼10% for the success rate in clinical development. However, prior analyses were limited by a narrow timeframe, a diverse research focus, biases in phase-to-phase transition methodology or a focus on specific use cases. We calculated unbiased input:output ratios (Phase I to FDA new drug approval) to analyze the likelihood of first approval using data from clinicaltrials.gov, encompassing a total of 2092 active ingredients, 19 927 clinical trials conducted by 18 leading pharmaceutical companies (2006-2022) and 274 new drug approvals. Our study reveals an average likelihood of first approval rate of 14.3% across leading research-based pharmaceutical companies, broadly ranging from 8% to 23%.

摘要

以往的分析给出了临床开发成功率约10%的行业基准。然而,之前的分析受到时间框架狭窄、研究重点多样、各阶段过渡方法存在偏差或专注于特定用例的限制。我们计算了无偏差的投入产出比(从一期试验到美国食品药品监督管理局新药批准),以使用来自clinicaltrials.gov的数据分析首次获批的可能性,该数据涵盖了总共2092种活性成分、18家领先制药公司(2006 - 2022年)开展的19927项临床试验以及274项新药批准。我们的研究表明,领先的研发型制药公司首次获批率的平均可能性为14.3%,大致在8%至23%之间。

相似文献

1
Benchmarking R&D success rates of leading pharmaceutical companies: an empirical analysis of FDA approvals (2006-2022).领先制药公司研发成功率的基准分析:对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)2006年至2022年批准情况的实证分析
Drug Discov Today. 2025 Feb;30(2):104291. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104291. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
Comparative analysis of FDA approvals by top 20 pharma companies (2014-2023).2014-2023 年,前 20 大制药公司的 FDA 批准药物的对比分析。
Drug Discov Today. 2024 Sep;29(9):104128. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104128. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
A case study assessing the impact of M&A and licensing on FDA drug approvals of leading pharmaceutical companies.一项评估并购和许可对大型制药公司FDA药物批准影响的案例研究。
Drug Discov Today. 2025 Mar;30(3):104306. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104306. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
4
Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies.衡量临床试验透明度:对新批准药物和大型制药公司的实证分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 5;7(12):e017917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917.
5
Analysis of Postapproval Clinical Trials of Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without Clinical Postmarketing Requirements or Commitments.分析美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗药物的批准后临床试验,这些药物无临床上市后要求或承诺。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3410.
6
2020 in review: FDA approvals of new medicines.2020年回顾:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的新药
Drug Discov Today. 2021 Dec;26(12):2794-2799. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
Modeling impact of inflation reduction act price negotiations on new drug pipeline considering differential contributions of large and small biopharmaceutical companies.考虑大型和小型生物制药公司的不同贡献,模拟《降低通胀法案》价格谈判对新药研发管线的影响。
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;22(1):88-99. doi: 10.1177/17407745241259112. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
8
2016 in review: FDA approvals of new molecular entities.2016 年回顾:FDA 批准的新分子实体。
Drug Discov Today. 2017 Nov;22(11):1593-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
9
Benchmarking biopharmaceutical process development and manufacturing cost contributions to R&D.基准化生物制药工艺开发和制造对研发的成本贡献。
MAbs. 2020 Jan-Dec;12(1):1754999. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1754999.
10
Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation.60年药物创新的经验教训。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009 Dec;8(12):959-68. doi: 10.1038/nrd2961.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-sectional study on the first-in-human trials of anticancer drugs in Japan and the United States and the probability of approval.一项关于日本和美国抗癌药物首次人体试验及获批概率的横断面研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02849-4.
2
Applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery for neurological diseases.人工智能在神经疾病药物研发中的应用。
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jul;22(4):e00624. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00624. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
3
Adverse Outcome Pathway and Machine Learning to Predict Drug Induced Seizure Liability.
不良结局途径与机器学习预测药物诱发癫痫的可能性
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2025 Jun 4;16(11):2085-2099. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00177. Epub 2025 May 14.