Suppr超能文献

实施策略:在一项电子学习干预中吸取的经验教训,以改善幼儿教育与保育中的饮食行为和喂养习惯。

Implementation strategies: lessons learned during an e-learning intervention to improve dietary behaviors and feeding practices in early childhood education and care.

作者信息

Lian Henrik, Øverby Nina Cecilie, Vik Frøydis Nordgård, Medin Anine Christine, Osorio Natalie Garzon, Helle Christine, Bjørkkjær Tormod, Love Penelope, Rutter Harry, Barker Mary Elizabeth, Hillesund Elisabet Rudjord, Helland Sissel Heidi

机构信息

Centre for Lifecourse Nutrition, Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Postbox 422, Kristiansand, 4604, Norway.

Insitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Nutr. 2025 Jan 13;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00990-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) centers play an important role in fostering healthy dietary habits. The Nutrition Now project focusing on improving dietary habits during the first 1000 days of life. Central to the project is the implementation of an e-learning resource aimed at promoting feeding practices among staff and healthy dietary behaviours for children aged 0-3 years in ECEC. Implementing new interventions often presents challenges. This study explores ECEC staff views and experiences with selected strategies for implementing an e-learning resource in ECEC centers in a municipality in Southern Norway.

METHODS

The study is a part of the Nutrition Now study, a hybrid type 1 non-randomized controlled trial. The implementation process followed the Dynamic Integrated Evaluation Model (DIEM). Implementation strategies were selected from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project and included identify and prepare champions, conduct educational meetings, distribute educational materials, create a learning collaborative, and remind clinicians. ECEC teachers from participating ECEC centers in the intervention municipality were recruited as champions. Brief (5-7 min minutes), semi-structured phone interviews, covering key points, were conducted with the champions 8 times, evenly distributed over six months. The interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 29 of the invited ECEC centers (53%) participated, and 260 brief interviews (88%) were conducted with champions (n = 37). An evaluation of the feedback from the champions suggests that the five selected implementation strategies were acceptable. Five main themes were developed by qualitative analysis: 1) Being a champion resembles what I already do. 2) Educational meetings are fine but take time. I prefer when peers share experiences. 3) Newsletters were helpful and reminded me, but I do not always have enough time to read. 4) Evaluations have increased my awareness, and we do them informally and formally. 5) The regular phone calls reminded me I could receive support and express my opinion.

CONCLUSION

This study's findings suggest that several implementation strategies are acceptable for stakeholders in an ECEC e-learning healthy eating intervention. However, time constraints among champions may hinder deep engagement. These results provide valuable insights into how the selected implementation strategies may function in practice and how they are perceived and experienced by the ECECs staff.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration on June 6, 2022: ISRCTN10694967 .

摘要

背景

幼儿教育与保育(ECEC)中心在培养健康饮食习惯方面发挥着重要作用。“现在就关注营养”项目聚焦于改善生命最初1000天的饮食习惯。该项目的核心是实施一项电子学习资源,旨在促进ECEC工作人员的喂养实践以及0至3岁儿童的健康饮食行为。实施新的干预措施往往会带来挑战。本研究探讨了挪威南部一个城市的ECEC中心工作人员对在ECEC中心实施电子学习资源的选定策略的看法和经验。

方法

该研究是“现在就关注营养”研究的一部分,这是一项混合型1非随机对照试验。实施过程遵循动态综合评估模型(DIEM)。实施策略选自实施变革专家建议(ERIC)项目,包括确定并培养倡导者、召开教育会议、分发教育材料、创建学习协作小组以及提醒临床医生。来自干预城市参与ECEC中心的ECEC教师被招募为倡导者。对倡导者进行了8次简短(5 - 7分钟)的半结构化电话访谈,涵盖关键点,访谈在六个月内平均分布。采用定性主题分析法对访谈进行分析。

结果

总共29个受邀的ECEC中心(53%)参与其中,与37位倡导者进行了260次简短访谈(88%)。对倡导者反馈的评估表明,选定的五项实施策略是可以接受的。通过定性分析得出了五个主要主题:1)成为倡导者类似于我已经在做的事情。2)教育会议不错,但很耗时。我更喜欢同行分享经验。3)时事通讯很有帮助且能提醒我,但我没有足够时间阅读。4)评估提高了我的意识,我们进行非正式和正式评估。5)定期电话提醒我可以获得支持并表达意见。

结论

本研究结果表明,对于ECEC电子学习健康饮食干预的利益相关者来说,几种实施策略是可以接受且合适的。然而,倡导者面临的时间限制可能会阻碍他们深入参与。这些结果为选定的实施策略在实践中的作用方式以及ECEC工作人员对它们的认知和体验提供了有价值的见解。

试验注册

于2022年6月6日进行试验注册:ISRCTN10694967 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e151/11726949/0b91ac5d324a/40795_2024_990_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验