Navigated instrumentation and ligament tensioning device enhances initial gap acquisition during total knee arthroplasty procedure: A cadaveric study.

PURPOSE

Gap-balanced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technique relies on initial ligament evaluation, particularly in patient-specific implantation using computer-assisted technologies. This cadaveric study aimed to compare the reproducibility and reliability of medial and lateral gap measurements between manual stress testing and dynamic ligament balancer.

METHODS

Initial gap acquisitions were assessed from eight cadaveric knees (four specimens) during the same navigated TKA procedure by five differently skilled surgeons (three seniors and two juniors). Medial and lateral gaps were sequentially acquired from extension to maximum knee flexion, applying manual stress prior to any bone cuts (conventional technique), and using intra-articular tensioning device placed between the tibial cut and the native femur (instrumented technique). Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), stratified by the measurement technique, the type of gaps and the operator experience. Differences in gaps (mm) between techniques were assessed using the Bland and Altmann method.

RESULTS

The instrumented technique showed higher ICCs than the conventional technique for medial and lateral gaps (0.87 vs. 0.60,  = 0.002, and 0.92 vs. 0.25,  < 0.0001, respectively), and showed no difference in ICCs between medial and lateral gap acquisitions (0.87 vs. 0.92,  = 0.8). Senior surgeons achieved higher ICCs than juniors, while non-significant with both techniques. Differences in gaps between techniques increased with knee flexion angle (0.8, 2.8 and 3.5 mm at 10°, 45° and 90° of flexion angle, respectively) and decreased with the operator experience ( = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The instrumented balancing technique offered better reproducibility than using manual valgus and varus stress, when measuring medial and lateral gaps. Tensioning devices may play a significant role in enhancing initial gap acquisition, disregarding the flexion angle and the operator experience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (observational study involving cadaveric specimens).