Suppr超能文献

禁食与自由口服摄入情况下心脏导管插入术的随机试验:CALORI试验

A Randomized Trial of Cardiac Catheterization With Fasting Versus Liberal Oral Intake: The CALORI Trial.

作者信息

Mitchell Brian K, Tomdio Anna, Pir Muhammad S, Mishra Suraj K, Dayanand Pradeep, Bonnet Guillaume, Alu Maria C, Gertz Zachary M

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Mary Washington Hospital, Fredericksburg, Virginia.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Oct 24;3(12):102291. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102291. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Routine preprocedural fasting before cardiac catheterization remains common practice, despite a lack of robust evidence to support this practice. We investigated the impact of a liberal nonfasting strategy vs a standardized nil per os (NPO) regimen prior to cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

Adult inpatients undergoing elective or urgent cardiac catheterization were randomized (1:1 ratio) to either NPO past midnight or ad libitum intake of liquids and solids (without dietary constraints) until immediately prior to the procedure. Only patients at high risk of aspiration or undergoing complex interventions were excluded. The primary end point was preprocedural patient-reported well-being scores (scaled 0-5, with 0 signifying absence of ailment and 5 the most extreme form), for variables including hunger, fatigue, anxiety, and nausea. A composite score summed the individual scores for hunger and fatigue. Other end points were periprocedural adverse events including emesis, aspiration, or intubation, in addition to postprocedural satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients (65% male and 42% Black) were included in the final analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Time from most recent oral intake (liquid or solid) to the start of the procedure averaged 148 minutes for the nonfasting group and 970 minutes for the NPO strategy ( < .001). The composite preprocedural well-being score was significantly better in the nonfasting arm (2.4 ± 2.4 nonfasting vs 6.0 ± 2.5 NPO; < .001), as were the individual components of hunger (0.9 ± 1.5 vs 3.7 ± 1.5; < .001), fatigue (1.5 ± 1.6 vs 2.3 ± 1.8; < .001), and nausea (0.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.5 ±1.2; = .006). There were no significant differences in adverse events between groups. Overall postprocedural satisfaction scores were significantly better in the nonfasting vs NPO group (0.3 ± 0.7 vs 1.0 ± 1.3, respectively; < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center randomized trial, a liberal nonfasting strategy prior to cardiac catheterization significantly improved patient well-being and satisfaction without compromising safety. Given the findings of this and other studies, routine fasting prior to cardiac catheterization should be reconsidered.

摘要

背景

尽管缺乏有力证据支持,但心脏导管插入术前常规进行术前禁食仍是常见做法。我们研究了宽松的非禁食策略与心脏导管插入术前标准化的禁食方案相比的影响。

方法

将接受择期或紧急心脏导管插入术的成年住院患者按1:1比例随机分为午夜后禁食组或随意摄入液体和固体组(无饮食限制),直至手术即将开始前。仅排除有高误吸风险或接受复杂干预的患者。主要终点是术前患者报告的健康状况评分(范围为0 - 5分,0表示无疾病,5表示最严重形式),变量包括饥饿、疲劳、焦虑和恶心。综合评分将饥饿和疲劳的个体评分相加。其他终点是围手术期不良事件,包括呕吐、误吸或插管,以及术后满意度。

结果

共有198例患者(65%为男性,42%为黑人)纳入最终分析。两组间基线特征无差异。非禁食组从最近一次口服摄入(液体或固体)到手术开始的平均时间为148分钟,禁食策略组为970分钟(P <.001)。非禁食组术前综合健康状况评分显著更好(非禁食组为2.4±2.4,禁食组为6.0±2.5;P <.001),饥饿(0.9±1.5对3.7±1.5;P <.001)、疲劳(1.5±1.6对2.3±1.8;P <.001)和恶心(0.1±0.5对0.5±1.2;P =.006)的个体评分也是如此。两组间不良事件无显著差异。非禁食组术后总体满意度评分显著高于禁食组(分别为0.3±0.7和1.0±1.3;P <.001)。

结论

在这项单中心随机试验中,心脏导管插入术前宽松的非禁食策略显著改善了患者的健康状况和满意度,且不影响安全性。鉴于本研究及其他研究的结果,应重新考虑心脏导管插入术前的常规禁食做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/612c/11725108/748aa4e40298/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验