Günyel Buse, Bulakçı Mesut, Başkent Gamze, Ünüvar Ayşegül
Department of Pediatrics, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Radiology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Turk J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 30;66(6):737-745. doi: 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.5195.
Patients with hemophilia should be evaluated for joint health and overall health in their visits. The aims of this study were to evaluate joint health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with mild, moderate, and severe hemophilia; determine which patient groups to focus on and whether there are any neglected patient groups.
This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. Patients were evaluated by ultrasonography (Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound [HEAD-US]), physical examination (Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 [HJHS-2.1]), and HRQoL scales (EQ-5D/EQ-VAS and Haemo-QoL).
Thirty-nine patients with regular follow-up were evaluated for a total of 234 joints. When hemophilia severity was compared with the HEAD-US and HJHS-2.1, a significant difference was found between severe and non-severe hemophilia. On the other hand, when patients' total HEAD-US scores were compared with total HJHS-2.1 scores, no statistically significant correlations were found; only a statistically significant but negligible correlation was detected when HEAD-US and HJHS-2.1 scores were examined at joint level. No significant difference was found when mild, moderate or severe hemophilia were compared with the HRQoL scores. Also, HEAD-US scores and HRQoL scores were not correlated, showing that the HRQoL score did not change whether the patient has arthropathy or not.
Despite recent advances in treatment options for hemophilia, arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia remains challenging. For the follow-up of pediatric hemophilia, the HEAD-US and HJHS should be used together because their correlation was weak. Although patients with severe hemophilia are at higher risk in terms of arthropathy, patients with mild/moderate hemophilia should not be ignored because their HRQoL is not different from that of severe hemophilia.
血友病患者在就诊时应接受关节健康和整体健康评估。本研究的目的是评估轻度、中度和重度血友病患者的关节健康及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL);确定应重点关注哪些患者群体以及是否存在被忽视的患者群体。
这是一项单中心横断面研究。通过超声检查(超声检测血友病早期关节病[HEAD-US])、体格检查(血友病关节健康评分第2.1版[HJHS-2.1])和HRQoL量表(EQ-5D/EQ-VAS和Haemo-QoL)对患者进行评估。
对39例定期随访的患者共234个关节进行了评估。将血友病严重程度与HEAD-US和HJHS-2.1进行比较时,发现重度和非重度血友病之间存在显著差异。另一方面,将患者的总HEAD-US评分与总HJHS-2.1评分进行比较时,未发现统计学上的显著相关性;仅在关节水平检查HEAD-US和HJHS-2.1评分时发现有统计学意义但可忽略不计的相关性。将轻度、中度或重度血友病与HRQoL评分进行比较时,未发现显著差异。此外,HEAD-US评分与HRQoL评分不相关,表明无论患者是否有关节病,HRQoL评分均无变化。
尽管血友病治疗方案最近有所进展,但重度血友病患者的关节病仍然具有挑战性。对于儿童血友病的随访,应同时使用HEAD-US和HJHS,因为它们的相关性较弱。虽然重度血友病患者在关节病方面风险较高,但轻度/中度血友病患者不应被忽视,因为他们的HRQoL与重度血友病患者并无差异。