Suppr超能文献

一项3期、56周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(OA-11),利用患者报告的结果和影像学结果评估洛雷西维因注射液治疗中重度膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。

A Phase 3, 56-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (OA-11) utilising patient-reported and radiographic outcomes evaluating the efficacy and safety of a lorecivivint injection in patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Yazici Yusuf, Tambiah Jeyanesh R S, Swearingen Christopher J, Britt Jonathan, Kennedy Sarah, Fineman Mark S, Simsek Ismail, Solomon Emily, McAlindon Timothy E

机构信息

Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc. San Diego, CA, and NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2025 May;43(5):854-860. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/hjt118. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intraarticular (IA) lorecivivint (LOR) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Patients with American College of Rheumatology criteria-defined knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 2-3, and medial Joint Space Width (JSW) by radiograph between 1.5 and 4 mm in the target knee were enrolled in this phase 3, 56-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive a single IA injection of 0.07 mg LOR or vehicle placebo (PBO) on Day 1. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12. Additional outcomes included the change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function, WOMAC Pain, Patient Global Assessment, medial JSW, and safety.

RESULTS

513 patients were randomised. Baseline mean medial JSW was 2.61 (±0.7) mm. The mean change from baseline in weekly average of daily Pain NRS at Week 12 was LOR -2.24 (± 0.13) compared with PBO -2.49 (± 0.13); p=0.185, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.12, 0.62). No discernable treatment effects of LOR compared with PBO were revealed by the analysis of other endpoints. Neither treatment group showed meaningful medial JSW loss over 52 weeks. Incidences, severity, and relationship to study treatment of AEs were similar between LOR and PBO treatment groups.

CONCLUSIOINS

In this study, LOR was well tolerated although it did not meet the primary endpoint of change from baseline in target knee Pain NRS at Week 12.

摘要

目的

确定关节内注射洛雷西维(LOR)治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

本研究为一项3期、为期56周、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,纳入符合美国风湿病学会标准定义的膝OA患者,Kellgren-Lawrence(KL)分级为2-3级,目标膝关节X线片显示内侧关节间隙宽度(JSW)在1.5至4mm之间。患者于第1天随机(1:1)接受单次关节内注射0.07mg LOR或赋形剂安慰剂(PBO)。主要终点是第12周时疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)相对于基线的变化。其他结局指标包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)功能、WOMAC疼痛、患者整体评估、内侧JSW相对于基线的变化以及安全性。

结果

513例患者被随机分组。基线时内侧JSW的平均测量值为2.61(±0.7)mm。第12周时,LOR组每日疼痛NRS每周平均值相对于基线的平均变化为-2.24(±0.13),而PBO组为-2.49(±0.13);p = 0.185,95%置信区间(CI)为(-0.12,0.62)。对其他终点的分析未显示LOR与PBO相比有明显的治疗效果。两个治疗组在52周内均未出现有意义的内侧JSW丢失。LOR组和PBO组不良事件(AE)的发生率、严重程度以及与研究治疗的关系相似。

结论

在本研究中,LOR耐受性良好,尽管未达到第12周时目标膝关节疼痛NRS相对于基线变化的主要终点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验