Cai Christopher L, Iyengar Sonia, Woolhandler Steffie, Himmelstein David U, Kannan Kavya, Simon Lisa
Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, New York.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54699.
Nearly all Medicare Advantage (MA) plans offer dental, vision, and hearing benefits not covered by traditional Medicare (TM). However, little is known about MA enrollees' use of those benefits or how much they cost MA insurers or enrollees.
To estimate use, out-of-pocket (OOP) spending, and insurer payments for dental, hearing, and vision services among Medicare beneficiaries.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis used pooled 2017-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) data for MA and TM beneficiaries (excluding those also covered by Medicaid). The analysis was performed from September 10, 2023, to June 30, 2024.
MA compared with TM coverage.
The main outcome was receipt of eye examinations, corrective lenses, hearing aids, optometry and dental visits, and MA and TM enrollees' and insurers' spending for such services. MEPS and MCBS data were weighted to be nationally representative.
We included 76 557 non-dually eligible Medicare beneficiaries, including 23 404 from the MEPS and 53 153 from the MCBS. Weighted demographic characteristics of MA and TM beneficiaries were similar (54.7% and 51.9% female; 39.8% and 35.2% older than 75 years, respectively). Only 54.2% (95% CI, 52.4%-55.9%) and 54.3% (95% CI 52.2%-56.3%) of MA beneficiaries were aware of having MA dental and vision coverage, respectively. MA enrollees were no more likely to receive eye examinations, hearing aids, or eyeglasses than TM enrollees. After adjustment for demographic differences, MA and TM enrollees paid OOP $205.86 (95% CI, $192.44-$219.27) and $226.12 (95% CI, $212.02-$240.23), respectively, for eyeglasses (MA - TM difference, -$20.27 [95% CI, -$33.77 to -$6.77] or -9.0% [95% CI, -14.9% to -3.0%]); $226.82 (95% CI, $202.24-$251.40) and $249.98 (95% CI, $226.22-$273.74) for dental visits, respectively (MA - TM difference, -$23.16 [95% CI, -$43.15 to -$3.17] or -9.3% [95% CI, -17.3% to -1.3%]); and no less for optometry visits or durable medical equipment (a proxy for hearing aids). Nationwide, MA plans' annual spending on vision, dental services, and durable medical equipment totaled $3.9 billion (95% CI, $3.3-$4.4 billion), while enrollees spent OOP $9.2 billion (95% CI, $8.2-$10.2 billion) annually for these services and other private insurers covered $2.8 billion (95% CI, $2.7-$3.0 billion).
In this cross-sectional study of 2 nationally representative surveys, MA beneficiaries did not receive more supplemental services than TM beneficiaries, possibly because of cost-sharing and limited awareness of benefit coverage.
几乎所有医疗保险优势(MA)计划都提供传统医疗保险(TM)未涵盖的牙科、视力和听力福利。然而,对于MA参保者对这些福利的使用情况,以及这些福利对MA保险公司或参保者的成本,我们知之甚少。
估计医疗保险受益人在牙科、听力和视力服务方面的使用情况、自付费用(OOP)以及保险公司的支付情况。
设计、背景和参与者:这项横断面分析使用了2017 - 2021年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)和医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)的汇总数据,对象为MA和TM受益人(不包括同时享有医疗补助的人群)。分析于2023年9月10日至2024年6月30日进行。
MA与TM覆盖范围的比较。
主要结局是接受眼部检查、矫正镜片、助听器、验光和牙科就诊,以及MA和TM参保者及其保险公司在这些服务上的支出。MEPS和MCBS数据经过加权以具有全国代表性。
我们纳入了76557名非双重资格的医疗保险受益人,其中23404名来自MEPS,53153名来自MCBS。MA和TM受益人的加权人口统计学特征相似(女性分别为54.7%和51.9%;75岁以上分别为39.8%和35.2%)。只有54.2%(95%CI,52.4% - 55.9%)和54.3%(95%CI,52.2% - 56.3%)的MA受益人分别知晓自己享有MA牙科和视力保险。MA参保者接受眼部检查、助听器或眼镜的可能性并不比TM参保者更高。在调整人口统计学差异后,MA和TM参保者购买眼镜的自付费用分别为205.86美元(95%CI,192.44 - 219.27美元)和226.12美元(95%CI,212.02 - 240.23美元)(MA - TM差异为 - 20.27美元[95%CI, - 33.77至 - 6.77美元]或 - 9.0%[95%CI, - 14.9%至 - 3.0%]);牙科就诊费用分别为226.82美元(95%CI,202.24 - 251.40美元)和249.98美元(95%CI,226.22 - 273.74美元)(MA - TM差异为 - 23.16美元[95%CI, - 43.15至 - 3.17美元]或 - 9.3%[95%CI, - 17.3%至 - 1.3%]);验光就诊或耐用医疗设备(助听器的替代指标)费用MA参保者并不更低。在全国范围内,MA计划在视力、牙科服务和耐用医疗设备上的年度支出总计39亿美元(95%CI,33 - 44亿美元),而参保者每年自付这些服务的费用为92亿美元(95%CI,82 - 102亿美元),其他私人保险公司支付28亿美元(95%CI,27 - 30亿美元)。
在这项基于两项全国代表性调查的横断面研究中,MA受益人获得的补充服务并不比TM受益人多,这可能是由于费用分摊和对福利覆盖范围的认知有限。