• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建术后步行时肢体负荷不足传递的动态膝关节接触力较小。

Limb Underloading in Walking Transmits Less Dynamic Knee Joint Contact Forces after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

作者信息

Munsch Amanda E, Evans-Pickett Alyssa, Davis-Wilson Hope, Pietrosimone Brian, Rauch Carly M, Roth Joshua D, Franz Jason R

机构信息

Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC.

Department of Exercise and Sport Science, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Apr 1;57(4):849-856. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003607. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003607
PMID:39809224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11908909/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often walk with a less dynamic vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), exemplified by a reduced first peak vGRF and elevated midstance vGRF compared with uninjured controls. However, the mechanism by which altered limb loading affects actual tibial plateau contact forces during walking remains unclear.

METHODS

Our purpose was to use musculoskeletal simulation to evaluate the effects of first peak vGRF biofeedback on bilateral tibiofemoral contact forces relevant to the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in 20 individuals with ACLR. We hypothesized that reduced first peak vGRF would produce less dynamic tibial plateau contact forces during walking in individuals with ACLR.

RESULTS

As the pivotal outcome from this study, and in support of our hypothesis, we found that less dynamic vGRF profiles in individuals with ACLR-observations that have associated in prior studies with more cartilage breakdown serum biomarkers and reduced proteoglycan density-are accompanied by less dynamic tibiofemoral joint contact forces during walking.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that more sustained limb-level loading, a phenotype that associates with worse knee joint health outcomes after ACLR and was prescribed herein using biofeedback, alters the loading profile and magnitude of force applied to tibiofemoral cartilage.

摘要

引言

前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者行走时的垂直地面反作用力(vGRF)动态变化通常较小,与未受伤的对照组相比,表现为首次峰值vGRF降低和支撑中期vGRF升高。然而,行走过程中肢体负荷改变影响实际胫骨平台接触力的机制仍不清楚。

方法

我们的目的是使用肌肉骨骼模拟来评估首次峰值vGRF生物反馈对20名ACLR患者双侧胫股接触力的影响,这些接触力与创伤后骨关节炎的发展相关。我们假设,ACLR患者行走时首次峰值vGRF降低会产生较小的动态胫骨平台接触力。

结果

作为本研究的关键结果,并支持我们的假设,我们发现ACLR患者动态vGRF曲线较小——先前研究表明,这些观察结果与更多的软骨分解血清生物标志物和蛋白聚糖密度降低有关——同时行走时胫股关节接触力的动态变化也较小。

结论

我们得出结论,更持续的肢体水平负荷,一种与ACLR后更差的膝关节健康结果相关的表型,本文中通过生物反馈进行设定,会改变施加于胫股软骨的负荷曲线和力的大小。

相似文献

1
Limb Underloading in Walking Transmits Less Dynamic Knee Joint Contact Forces after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后步行时肢体负荷不足传递的动态膝关节接触力较小。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Apr 1;57(4):849-856. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003607. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Gait Mechanics and T1ρ MRI of Tibiofemoral Cartilage 6 Months after ACL Reconstruction.ACL 重建后 6 个月的胫股软骨的步态力学和 T1ρ MRI
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Apr;51(4):630-639. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001834.
3
Between-Limb Differences in Patellofemoral Joint Forces During Running at 12 to 24 Months After Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.单侧前交叉韧带重建后 12 至 24 个月跑步时髌股关节力的肢体间差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1711-1719. doi: 10.1177/0363546520914628. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
Greater Mechanical Loading During Walking Is Associated With Less Collagen Turnover in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.在进行前交叉韧带重建的个体中,行走时更大的机械负荷与更少的胶原蛋白周转相关。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):425-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546515618380. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
5
Walking Ground Reaction Force Post-ACL Reconstruction: Analysis of Time and Symptoms.ACL 重建术后步行地面反作用力:时间和症状分析。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Feb;51(2):246-254. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001776.
6
Immediate Biochemical Changes After Gait Biofeedback in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后步态生物反馈即刻的生化变化。
J Athl Train. 2020 Oct 1;55(10):1106-1115. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0372.19.
7
Real-time biofeedback can increase and decrease vertical ground reaction force, knee flexion excursion, and knee extension moment during walking in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.实时生物反馈可以增加和减少前交叉韧带重建患者行走过程中的垂直地面反作用力、膝关节屈曲幅度和膝关节伸展力矩。
J Biomech. 2018 Jul 25;76:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
8
Biomechanical Threshold Values for Identifying Clinically Significant Knee-Related Symptoms 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后6个月用于识别具有临床意义的膝关节相关症状的生物力学阈值
J Athl Train. 2025 Feb 1;60(2):103-110. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0562.23.
9
Reduced step length reduces knee joint contact forces during running following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but does not alter inter-limb asymmetry.在进行前交叉韧带重建后跑步时,步长减小会降低膝关节接触力,但不会改变双侧肢体不对称性。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Mar;43:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Effects of BMI on Walking Speed and Gait Biomechanics after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.BMI 对前交叉韧带重建后行走速度和步态生物力学的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jan;53(1):108-114. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002460.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustained Limb-Level Loading: A Ground Reaction Force Phenotype Common to Individuals at High Risk for and Those With Knee Osteoarthritis.持续的肢体水平加载:一种常见于膝关节骨关节炎高危人群和患者的地面反力表型。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Apr;76(4):566-576. doi: 10.1002/art.42744. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Lower Patellofemoral Joint Contact Force During Side-Step Cutting After Return-to-Sports Clearance Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后重返运动许可后侧步急停时髌股关节接触力降低。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jun;51(7):1777-1784. doi: 10.1177/03635465231166104. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Evaluating the risk of knee osteoarthritis following unilateral ACL reconstruction based on an EMG-assisted method.基于肌电图辅助方法评估单侧前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节骨关节炎的风险。
Front Physiol. 2023 Apr 21;14:1160261. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1160261. eCollection 2023.
4
High tibiofemoral contact and muscle forces during gait are associated with radiographic knee OA progression over 3 years.在步态过程中,胫骨高位与股四头肌的接触和肌肉力量与膝关节 OA 的放射学进展有关,这种进展在 3 年内发生。
Knee. 2023 Mar;41:245-256. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
5
Between-Limb Symmetry in ACL and Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Athletes After ACL Reconstruction and Clearance for Return to Sport.前交叉韧带重建及获准恢复运动后运动员的肢体间对称性与胫股接触力
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Apr 11;10(4):23259671221084742. doi: 10.1177/23259671221084742. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Loading during Midstance of Gait Is Associated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage Composition Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.在步态的中间期加载与前交叉韧带重建后软骨成分的磁共振成像有关。
Cartilage. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):19476035211072220. doi: 10.1177/19476035211072220.
7
Association of Machine Learning-Based Predictions of Medial Knee Contact Force With Cartilage Loss Over 2.5 Years in Knee Osteoarthritis.基于机器学习的内侧膝关节接触力预测与膝关节骨关节炎 2.5 年以上软骨丢失的关联。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;73(9):1638-1645. doi: 10.1002/art.41735. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
Immediate Biochemical Changes After Gait Biofeedback in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后步态生物反馈即刻的生化变化。
J Athl Train. 2020 Oct 1;55(10):1106-1115. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0372.19.
9
Biomechanical effects of manipulating peak vertical ground reaction force throughout gait in individuals 6-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后 6-12 个月个体在步态中改变峰值垂直地面反作用力的生物力学效应。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Jun;76:105014. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105014. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
10
Bilateral Gait 6 and 12 Months Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared with Controls.双侧步态 6 个月和 12 个月后前交叉韧带重建与对照组比较。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Apr;52(4):785-794. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002208.