Suppr超能文献

喉癌生存的影响因素及治疗方式比较

Influential Factors on Survival in Laryngeal Cancer and Treatment Modalities Comparison.

作者信息

So Cher Pin, Shin Yura, Ganesh Vaishnevy, Manickavasagam Jaiganesh Jai, Casasola Richard

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ninewells hospital, Dundee, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2025;87(1):27-38. doi: 10.1159/000543445. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laryngeal cancer (LC) is the most common malignancy in otolaryngology, comprising 30-40% of head and neck malignancies. With an increasing incidence worldwide over the past few decades, LC has resulted in substantial strain on the NHS. There have been notable advancements in the treatment of LC over the years, particularly with the adoption of non-surgical methods, which emerged after the 1991 study conducted by the Veterans Affairs. Nevertheless, there has been an increase in mortality rates for head and neck cancer by approximately 15% in the UK over the last decade. This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with LC in our population, considering both the disease stage and treatment modality applied.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 2015 to 2019 for all patients who were diagnosed with primary LC at NHS Tayside. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in LC. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the treatment modalities in different stages of LC.

RESULTS

Patients with advanced LC (stages 3 and 4) had more than 5 times risk of mortality compared to patients with early LC (stage 1 and 2) (DSS: HR 6.10, 95% CI: 1.52-14.61, p = 0.016; OS: HR 5.52, 95% CI: 1.64-13.34, p = 0.017). In patients with stage 4 LC, laryngectomy provides better survival outcomes than chemoradiotherapy (DSS: p = 0.035; OS: p = 0.046). In addition, DSS was double, and OS was 3 times higher for patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy following laryngectomy compared to patients who underwent laryngectomy alone (DSS: p = 0.036; OS: p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Our study supports that surgical treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy improves the survival outcomes of advanced LC and should be considered as first-line treatment in patients who are fit for surgery. More prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for advanced LC with consideration of organ function, patient quality of life, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality.

摘要

引言

喉癌(LC)是耳鼻喉科最常见的恶性肿瘤,占头颈恶性肿瘤的30%-40%。在过去几十年里,全球喉癌发病率不断上升,给英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)带来了巨大压力。多年来,喉癌治疗取得了显著进展,特别是自1991年退伍军人事务部开展研究后采用的非手术方法。然而,在过去十年中,英国头颈癌死亡率上升了约15%。本研究旨在评估我们人群中喉癌患者的生存结局,同时考虑疾病分期和所采用的治疗方式。

方法

收集了2015年至2019年在NHS泰赛德被诊断为原发性喉癌的所有患者的回顾性数据。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定与喉癌总生存(OS)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)相关的因素。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析,以比较喉癌不同分期的治疗方式。

结果

晚期喉癌(3期和4期)患者的死亡风险是早期喉癌(1期和2期)患者的5倍多(疾病特异性生存:风险比6.10,95%置信区间:1.52-14.61,p = 0.016;总生存:风险比5.52,95%置信区间:1.64-13.34,p = 0.017)。在4期喉癌患者中,喉切除术比放化疗提供了更好的生存结局(疾病特异性生存:p = 0.035;总生存:p = 0.046)。此外,与仅接受喉切除术的患者相比,喉切除术后接受辅助放疗的患者疾病特异性生存翻倍,总生存提高了3倍(疾病特异性生存:p = 0.036;总生存:p = 0.032)。

结论

我们的研究支持辅助放疗的手术治疗可改善晚期喉癌的生存结局,对于适合手术的患者应考虑作为一线治疗。需要更多前瞻性研究来确定晚期喉癌的最佳治疗方法,同时考虑器官功能、患者生活质量以及治疗相关的发病率和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2283/12263134/334447792d9f/orl-2025-0087-0001-543445_F01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验