Suppr超能文献

无关言语和非言语声音对儿童及成人言语和空间项目系列回忆的影响。

Impact of irrelevant speech and non-speech sounds on serial recall of verbal and spatial items in children and adults.

作者信息

Leist Larissa, Lachmann Thomas, Klatte Maria

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Science, Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Centro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28007, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85855-w.

Abstract

Short-term memory for sequences of verbal items such as written words is reliably impaired by task-irrelevant background sounds, a phenomenon known as the "Irrelevant Sound Effect" (ISE). Different theoretical accounts have been proposed to explain the mechanisms underlying the ISE. Some of these assume specific interference between obligatory sound processing and phonological or serial order representations generated during task performance, whereas other posit that background sounds involuntarily divert attention away from the focal task. To explore the roles of phonological processing, serial order retention, and attention control, we analyzed the effects of environmental non-speech sounds and unfamiliar speech on serial recall of verbal items (pictures representing German nouns) and spatial items (dot locations) in children (n = 137) and adults (n = 98). In the verbal task, both age groups were equally affected by background sounds, with speech impairing recall more than environmental sounds. In the spatial task, no ISE was found in adults and fourth graders, but third graders exhibited significant performance impairment from both sounds. There was no habituation to the sound effects across the experimental trials. The findings indicate that both specific interference and attention capture may contribute to the ISE, with the impact of attention capture potentially decreasing with age.

摘要

诸如书面文字等言语项目序列的短期记忆会因与任务无关的背景声音而受到可靠的损害,这一现象被称为“无关声音效应”(ISE)。人们提出了不同的理论解释来阐释ISE背后的机制。其中一些理论假设在任务执行过程中,强制性声音处理与语音或序列顺序表征之间存在特定干扰,而另一些理论则认为背景声音会不自觉地将注意力从核心任务上转移开。为了探究语音处理、序列顺序保持和注意力控制的作用,我们分析了环境非语音声音和陌生语音对儿童(n = 137)和成人(n = 98)言语项目(代表德语名词的图片)和空间项目(点的位置)序列回忆的影响。在言语任务中,两个年龄组受背景声音的影响程度相同,语音对回忆的损害大于环境声音。在空间任务中,成人和四年级学生未发现ISE,但三年级学生在两种声音条件下均表现出显著的成绩受损。在整个实验过程中,对声音效果没有产生习惯化。研究结果表明,特定干扰和注意力捕获都可能导致ISE,且注意力捕获的影响可能会随着年龄增长而降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b836/11732993/87508664cbe6/41598_2025_85855_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Aug;44(8):1303-1312. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000537. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
4
Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
5
What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.
Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1669-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01263.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
6
Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:276-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
7
Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):841-848. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0806-8.
9
Precision of working memory for speech sounds.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(10):2022-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1002799. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of unintelligible speech noise on children's verbal working memory performance.
Front Psychol. 2025 May 26;16:1565112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565112. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing-state irrelevant speech disrupts visual-verbal but not visual-spatial serial recall.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Nov;50(11):1772-1790. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001360. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Lexical access speed and the development of phonological recoding during immediate serial recall.
J Cogn Dev. 2022;23(5):624-643. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2083140. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
Online mouse cursor trajectories distinguish phonological activation by linguistic and nonlinguistic sounds.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):362-372. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02153-6. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
6
Noise pollution and human cognition: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of recent evidence.
Environ Int. 2022 Jan;158:106905. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106905. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Listening to speech and non-speech sounds activates phonological and semantic knowledge differently.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Aug;73(8):1135-1149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820923944. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jul;149(7):1360-1397. doi: 10.1037/xge0000714. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验