采用可变时间安排进行匹配和最大化。
Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.
作者信息
DeCarlo L T
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):75-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-75.
Abstract
Pigeons were offered choices between a variable-time schedule that arranged reinforcers throughout the session and a variable-time schedule that arranged reinforcers only when the pigeon was spending time on it. The subjects could maximize the overall rate of reinforcement in this situation by biasing their time allocation towards the latter schedule. This arrangement provides an alternative to concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules for testing whether animals maximize overall rates or match relative rates, and has the advantage of being free of the asymmetrical response requirements present with those schedules. The results were contrary to those predicted by maximizing: The bias it predicts did not appear.
摘要
给鸽子提供两种可变时距程序的选择，一种是在整个实验过程中安排强化物，另一种是只有当鸽子在该程序上花费时间时才安排强化物。在这种情况下，实验对象可以通过将时间分配偏向后者的程序来使整体强化率最大化。这种安排为测试动物是使整体强化率最大化还是匹配相对强化率提供了一种替代同时可变间隔可变比率程序的方法，并且具有不存在那些程序所具有的不对称反应要求的优点。结果与最大化预测的结果相反：预测的偏向并未出现。
相似文献
1
Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.采用可变时间安排进行匹配和最大化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):75-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-75.
2
Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.并发比率-间隔时间表下的匹配与最大化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):217-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-217.
3
A test of the melioration theory of matching.匹配的改善理论测试。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Apr;15(2):99-113.
4
Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.强化的并发比率-间隔时间表中的人类选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):453-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-453.
5
Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules.并发可变间隔时间表中的严格随机交替。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jan;79(1):65-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-65.
6
Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules.连锁时间表中的条件强化与强化时间
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):381-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-381.
7
Matching, maximizing, and the behavioral unit: concurrent reinforcement of response sequences.匹配、最大化与行为单元：反应序列的并发强化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):97-114. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-97.
8
More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.关于并发间隔比率时间表的更多内容：一项重复研究与综述。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):331-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-331.
9
Matching since Baum (1979).自鲍姆（1979年）以来的匹配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):339-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-339.
10
Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.将偏差作为鸽子对备选物偏好的一种衡量方法。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jul;32(1):1-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-1.
引用本文的文献
1
When does reward maximization lead to matching law?奖励最大化何时会导致匹配法则？
PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003795. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
2
How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate.如何教鸽子最大化整体强化率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):277-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-277.
3
Maximizing versus matching on concurrent variable-interval schedules.最大化与匹配在同时性可变时距程序上。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):325-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-325.
4
Income maximizing on concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.同时比率-间隔强化程序的收入最大化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):273-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-273.
5
Is there a decisive test between matching and maximizing?匹配和最大化之间是否存在决定性的检验？
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):113-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-113.
6
Effects of response-allocation constraints on multiple-schedule performance.反应分配约束对多项时间表表现的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):29-39. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-29.
7
Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.强化的并发比率-间隔时间表中的人类选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):453-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-453.
8
More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.关于并发间隔比率时间表的更多内容：一项重复研究与综述。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):331-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-331.
本文引用的文献
1
Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.同时采用变时距变比率强化程序只能为匹配提供微弱的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):83-100. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-83.
2
Melioration, matching, and maximization.改善、匹配和最大化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):141-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-141.
3
Optimal choice.最佳选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):397-412. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-397.
4
Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio?同时采用变化比例和变化间隔强化时，匹配是否与强化最大化兼容？
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Mar;31(2):209-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-209.
5
Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.同时变时距强化程序绩效的再评价：不匹配现象
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):203-14. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-203.
6
Time-based and count-based measurement of preference.基于时间和基于计数的偏好测量。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):27-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-27.
7
Time allocation in human vigilance.人类警戒中的时间分配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jan;23(1):45-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-45.
8
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.两种偏离匹配律的情况：偏向和不匹配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
9
The correlation-based law of effect.基于关联的效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137.
10
Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.相对强化率和转换延迟对强化无关的同时呈现强化程序的一些影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):683-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-683.
Zotero 插件