Afify Sameh, Elsabaawy Maha, Al-Arab Ahmed Ezz, Edrees Ahmed
Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Prz Gastroenterol. 2024;16(4):446-453. doi: 10.5114/pg.2024.143148. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is frequently discovered in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Studies have yielded conflicting results regarding its impact on the technical success of ERCP and post-ERCP complications.
This study aims to assess the success and safety of ERCP in patients with PAD.
This study included 400 patients who underwent ERCP for common bile duct (CBD) stones. Patients were classified into the PAD group (200 patients) and the non-PAD group (200 patients). Within the PAD group, patients were further subclassified into three types based on the location of the papilla. The study compared the two groups in terms of technical success and ERCP complications.
The success rate of cannulation using selective techniques, needle-knife precut, or trans-pancreatic sphincterotomy was 88%, 7.5%, and 4.5%, respectively, for the PAD group and 81%, 9.5%, and 9.5%, respectively, for the non-PAD group ( = 0.099). Complete CBD clearance was achieved in 85% of the PAD group and 84% of the non-PAD group ( = 0.782). The rate of post-ERCP complications was similar in both groups ( = 0.371). Periampullary diverticulum type 1 was associated with more challenging cannulation ( < 0.001), a lower rate of complete CBD clearance ( < 0.001), and a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis ( = 0.002) compared to other types.
The presence of PAD does not hinder the technical success of ERCP and is not associated with a higher frequency of post-ERCP complications.
壶腹周围憩室(PAD)在接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的患者中经常被发现。关于其对ERCP技术成功率和ERCP术后并发症的影响,研究结果相互矛盾。
本研究旨在评估PAD患者ERCP的成功率和安全性。
本研究纳入了400例因胆总管结石接受ERCP的患者。患者被分为PAD组(200例)和非PAD组(200例)。在PAD组中,根据乳头位置将患者进一步细分为三种类型。该研究比较了两组在技术成功率和ERCP并发症方面的情况。
PAD组使用选择性技术、针刀预切开或经胰括约肌切开术的插管成功率分别为88%、7.5%和4.5%,非PAD组分别为81%、9.5%和9.5%(P = 0.099)。PAD组85%的患者实现了胆总管完全清除,非PAD组为84%(P = 0.782)。两组ERCP术后并发症发生率相似(P = 0.371)。与其他类型相比,1型壶腹周围憩室插管更具挑战性(P < 0.001),胆总管完全清除率更低(P < 0.001),ERCP术后胰腺炎发生率更高(P = 0.002)。
PAD的存在并不妨碍ERCP的技术成功,也与ERCP术后并发症的较高发生率无关。