Mars Katarina, Hofmann Robin, Jonsson Martin, Manouras Aristomenis, Engvall Jan, Yndigegn Troels, Jernberg Tomas, Shahgaldi Kambiz, Sundqvist Martin G
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset 10, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar 27;26(4):620-627. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf015.
The REDUCE-AMI trial showed that beta-blockers in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) had no effect on mortality or cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this substudy was to evaluate whether global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a better prognostic marker than LVEF, and if beta-blockers have a beneficial effect in patients with decreased GLS.
REDUCE-AMI was a registry-based randomized clinical trial. Conventional echocardiographic parameters and GLS were obtained and a likelihood ratio test between models adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous AMI, and multi-vessel disease was used to compare LVEF and GLS as prognostic methods. A Cox regression model evaluated the impact of beta-blocker treatment on the composite endpoint of death from any cause or new AMI. A total of 1436 patients (28.6% of the total population) were included in this substudy. Due to poor image quality or incompatible equipment, 324 (22.6%) patients were excluded from the analysis of GLS. The median GLS was 17.3%. The likelihood ratio test resulted in no difference (P = 0.56) when comparing the combination of GLS to LVEF. The results were robust when adding beta-blocker randomization status as an independent variable.
In patients after AMI with preserved LVEF, GLS did not add prognostic value regarding death from any cause or new AMI. In addition, beta-blocker treatment did not alter the prognostic information obtained from GLS. Consequently, this study does not support an additive value of GLS compared with standard echocardiographic measurement in this patient population.
REDUCE-AMI试验表明,急性心肌梗死(AMI)后左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的患者使用β受体阻滞剂对死亡率或心血管结局无影响。本亚组研究的目的是评估整体纵向应变(GLS)是否比LVEF是更好的预后标志物,以及β受体阻滞剂对GLS降低的患者是否有有益作用。
REDUCE-AMI是一项基于注册登记的随机临床试验。获取了传统超声心动图参数和GLS,并使用针对年龄、性别、高血压、吸烟、糖尿病、既往AMI和多支血管病变进行调整的模型之间的似然比检验,以比较LVEF和GLS作为预后方法。Cox回归模型评估了β受体阻滞剂治疗对任何原因导致的死亡或新发AMI复合终点的影响。本亚组研究共纳入1436例患者(占总人群的28.6%)。由于图像质量差或设备不兼容,324例(22.6%)患者被排除在GLS分析之外。GLS的中位数为17.3%。比较GLS与LVEF的组合时,似然比检验无差异(P = 0.56)。将β受体阻滞剂随机分组状态作为自变量添加后,结果依然稳健。
在AMI后LVEF保留的患者中,GLS在任何原因导致的死亡或新发AMI方面并未增加预后价值。此外,β受体阻滞剂治疗并未改变从GLS获得的预后信息。因此,本研究不支持在该患者群体中GLS相对于标准超声心动图测量具有附加价值。