Tan Nuopei, Xia Changfa, Yan Xinxin, Cao Maomao, Yang Fan, He Siyi, Zhang Shaoli, Cao Mengdi, Teng Yi, Li Qianru, Wang Jiachen, Chen Wanqing
Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Cancer Lett. 2025 Mar 1;612:217457. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217457. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
The optimal breast cancer (BC) screening age in China remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of lowering the screening starting age from 45 to 35 years and extending the stopping age from 64 to 79 years in Chinese women at an average risk of progressing BC. Biennial screening showed a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to annual screening. Extending the screening age beyond 45-64 years in certain scenarios increased the number of false-positive results and each averted breast cancer deaths. Specifically, extending the starting age to 35 years reduced overdiagnosis rate to 10.8 % and had an incremental cost ratio of US$12,746 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), falling below the cost-effectiveness threshold of US$18,346 per QALY. Regarding the ceasing age, the status quo (age 64 years) was found to be the optimal choice as it was proved to yield the majority of benefits with reduced harm and be the only option under the cost-effectiveness threshold. In summary, biennial screening for average-risk women aged 35-64 years is the most cost-effective approach strategy, aligning with The National Health Commission's screening program for cervical and breast cancer.
中国乳腺癌(BC)的最佳筛查年龄仍不确定。在本研究中,我们评估了将中国进展期BC平均风险女性的筛查起始年龄从45岁降至35岁以及将筛查终止年龄从64岁延长至79岁的益处、危害和成本效益。与每年筛查相比,每两年进行一次筛查显示出较低的增量成本效益比(ICER)。在某些情况下,将筛查年龄延长至45 - 64岁以上会增加假阳性结果的数量以及每避免一例乳腺癌死亡的成本。具体而言,将起始年龄延长至35岁可将过度诊断率降至10.8%,每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本比为12,746美元,低于每QALY 18,346美元的成本效益阈值。关于终止年龄,现状(64岁)被认为是最佳选择,因为它被证明能带来大部分益处,同时危害减少,并且是成本效益阈值以下的唯一选择。总之,对35 - 64岁平均风险女性每两年进行一次筛查是最具成本效益的方法策略,与国家卫生健康委员会的宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查计划一致。