• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项定量评估英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院信托机构中电子处方系统性能的模拟研究。

A simulation study to quantitatively assess the performance of electronic prescribing systems in English NHS Hospital Trusts.

作者信息

Klein Stephanie, Tsanas Athanasios, Coleman Jamie, Osselton Rebecca, Heed Jude, Slee Ann, Watson Neil

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, England, UK.

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 16;15(1):2120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86112-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-86112-w
PMID:39814768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11736027/
Abstract

Prescribing errors are a source of preventable harm in healthcare, which may be mitigated using Electronic Prescribing (EP) systems. Anyone who routinely prescribes medication could benefit from digitally assisted automated checks to identify whether a prescription should potentially not be allowed (e.g. drug allergy). National Health Service (NHS) Trusts have implemented a range of EP systems; however, their performance has not hitherto been evaluated. We developed the web-based Electronic Prescribing Risk and Safety Evaluation (ePRaSE) tool, which comprises a bank of prescribing scenarios to evaluate the performance of EP systems. We solicited ePRaSE testing: 68 pharmacists from across 45 English NHS Trusts, utilising 13 different EP systems volunteered for the study. We found considerable variability in mitigation performance (systems correctly identifying risk of error when prescribing) across both NHS Trusts and EP systems. Moreover, we found that mitigation performance varied considerably across NHS Trusts using the same EP system, strongly suggesting there are opportunities to optimise performance within systems. The ePRaSE tool is effective in identifying variability in risk management between NHS Trusts and EP systems. Wider use of this tool may facilitate improvements in EP system configurations, thus minimising potential harm from prescribing errors.

摘要

处方错误是医疗保健中可预防伤害的一个来源,使用电子处方(EP)系统或许可以减轻这种情况。任何经常开处方的人都可以从数字辅助自动检查中受益,以确定某个处方是否可能不被允许(例如药物过敏)。国民保健服务(NHS)信托机构已经实施了一系列EP系统;然而,它们的性能迄今尚未得到评估。我们开发了基于网络的电子处方风险与安全评估(ePRaSE)工具,该工具包含一组处方场景,用于评估EP系统的性能。我们征集了ePRaSE测试:来自45个英国NHS信托机构的68名药剂师,使用13种不同的EP系统自愿参与了这项研究。我们发现,在NHS信托机构和EP系统中,缓解性能(系统在开处方时正确识别错误风险)存在很大差异。此外,我们发现,使用相同EP系统的NHS信托机构之间的缓解性能差异很大,这有力地表明系统内部存在优化性能的机会。ePRaSE工具可有效识别NHS信托机构和EP系统之间风险管理的差异。更广泛地使用此工具可能有助于改进EP系统配置,从而将处方错误造成的潜在伤害降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/ae4b79502e95/41598_2025_86112_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/1d50e1666a20/41598_2025_86112_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/0c2686f61366/41598_2025_86112_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/dd084c1f0eab/41598_2025_86112_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/ae4b79502e95/41598_2025_86112_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/1d50e1666a20/41598_2025_86112_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/0c2686f61366/41598_2025_86112_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/dd084c1f0eab/41598_2025_86112_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fe/11736027/ae4b79502e95/41598_2025_86112_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A simulation study to quantitatively assess the performance of electronic prescribing systems in English NHS Hospital Trusts.一项定量评估英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院信托机构中电子处方系统性能的模拟研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 16;15(1):2120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86112-w.
2
The use and functionality of electronic prescribing systems in english acute NHS trusts: a cross-sectional survey.英国国民保健制度中电子处方系统的使用和功能:一项横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e80378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080378. eCollection 2013.
3
A Qualitative Study Exploring the Acceptability and Usability of the e-Prescribing Risk and Safety Evaluation (ePRaSE) Assessment Within English Hospitals.一项探索电子处方风险与安全评估(ePRaSE)在英国医院的可接受性和可用性的定性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2025 Aug 1;21(5):309-316. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001322. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
Impact of an inpatient electronic prescribing system on prescribing error causation: a qualitative evaluation in an English hospital.住院电子医嘱系统对医嘱错误成因的影响:英国某医院的定性评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):529-538. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006631. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Strategies to reduce insulin prescribing errors in UK hospitals: results from a national survey.在英国医院减少胰岛素处方错误的策略:一项全国性调查的结果。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jul;37(7):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/dme.14209. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
The effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing.电子处方对处方质量的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;65(2):230-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02995.x. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
7
Qualitative study exploring the phenomenon of multiple electronic prescribing systems within single hospital organisations.探索单一医院机构内多个电子处方系统现象的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3750-1.
8
Learning from electronic prescribing errors: a mixed methods study of junior doctors' perceptions of training and individualised feedback data.从电子处方错误中学习:一项混合方法研究,探讨初级医生对培训和个体化反馈数据的看法。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 22;12(12):e056221. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056221.
9
A national survey of inpatient medication systems in English NHS hospitals.一项针对英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院住院用药系统的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 27;14:93. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-93.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Decision Support: Moving Beyond Interruptive "Pop-up" Alerts.临床决策支持:超越干扰性的“弹出式”警报
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Sep;98(9):1275-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.05.025.
2
Clinical Decision Support Stewardship: Best Practices and Techniques to Monitor and Improve Interruptive Alerts.临床决策支持管理:监测和改进干扰性警报的最佳实践和技术。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):560-568. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748856. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
Relevance, redundancy, and complementarity trade-off (RRCT): A principled, generic, robust feature-selection tool.
相关性、冗余性和互补性权衡(RRCT):一种有原则的、通用的、强大的特征选择工具。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Mar 31;3(5):100471. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100471. eCollection 2022 May 13.
4
An e-Delphi study to obtain expert consensus on the level of risk associated with preventable e-prescribing events.一项电子德尔菲研究,旨在就可预防电子处方事件相关风险水平达成专家共识。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;88(7):3351-3359. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15284. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
The appropriateness of clinical decision support systems alerts in supporting clinical workflows: A systematic review.临床决策支持系统警报在支持临床工作流程中的适宜性:系统评价。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211007536. doi: 10.1177/14604582211007536.
6
Medication errors and adverse drug events in a UK hospital during the optimisation of electronic prescriptions: a prospective observational study.在优化电子处方期间,英国一家医院的药物错误和药物不良事件:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Dec;1(8):e403-e412. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30158-X. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
7
Impact of a clinical decision support tool targeting QT-prolonging medications.针对延长 QT 间期药物的临床决策支持工具的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Nov 16;77(Supplement_4):S111-S117. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa269.
8
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support.权衡安全性与报警疲劳:来自全国范围内医院用药相关临床决策支持系统评估的数据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1252-1258. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa098.
9
Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England.英格兰药物错误的流行情况及其临床和经济负担的经济分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):96-105. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
Clinician preferences for computerised clinical decision support for medications in primary care: a focus group study.基层医疗中临床医生对药物计算机化临床决策支持的偏好:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Apr;26(1):0. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000015.