Villamor Eduardo, Galán-Henríquez Gloria, Bartoš František, Gonzalez-Luis Gema E
Division of Neonatology, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil de Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Pediatr Res. 2025 Jan 15. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-03820-9.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to demonstrate the beneficial effects of the pharmacological treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants. We conducted a Bayesian model averaged (BMA) meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the pharmacological treatment of PDA with placebo or expectant treatment.
We searched for RCTs including infants with gestational age (GA) ≤ 32 weeks and with a rate of open-label treatment of less than 25% in the control arm. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We calculated Bayes factors (BFs). The BF is the ratio of the probability of the data under H (pharmacological treatment is beneficial) over the probability of the data under H (pharmacological treatment is harmful).
Five RCTs were included (1341 infants). BMA showed strong evidence in favor of the harmful effect of medication for BPD (BF = 0.02) and BPD or death (BF = 0.03). When the two largest trials, which used early (<72 h) ibuprofen in infants with GA ≤ 28 weeks, were pooled, the BMA demonstrated moderate evidence in favor of higher mortality in the medication group (BF = 0.24).
Pharmacological treatment of PDA in extremely preterm infants may result in more complications than clinical benefit.
Randomized controlled trials spanning several decades have investigated the pharmacological treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) but have failed to demonstrate an improvement in mortality or short-term morbidity. We conducted a Bayesian meta-analysis to answer the question: Is the pharmacological treatment of PDA beneficial or harmful in very and extremely preterm infants? Bayesian meta-analysis showed strong evidence in favor of higher rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and death or BPD in infants receiving pharmacological treatment of PDA when compared with infants receiving placebo or expectant management. Pharmacological treatment of PDA in extremely preterm infants may result in more complications than clinical benefit.
随机对照试验(RCT)未能证明药物治疗早产儿动脉导管未闭(PDA)的有益效果。我们对比较PDA药物治疗与安慰剂或期待治疗的RCT进行了贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)荟萃分析。
我们搜索了纳入胎龄(GA)≤32周且对照组开放标签治疗率低于25%的婴儿的RCT。主要结局是死亡率,次要结局包括支气管肺发育不良(BPD)。我们计算了贝叶斯因子(BF)。BF是在假设H(药物治疗有益)下数据的概率与在假设H(药物治疗有害)下数据的概率之比。
纳入了5项RCT(1341例婴儿)。BMA显示有强有力的证据支持药物治疗对BPD有有害影响(BF = 0.02)以及对BPD或死亡有有害影响(BF = 0.03)。当将两项最大的试验(对GA≤28周的婴儿使用早期(<72小时)布洛芬)合并时,BMA显示有中等证据支持药物治疗组死亡率更高(BF = 0.24)。
极早产儿PDA的药物治疗可能导致更多并发症而非临床益处。
数十年来的随机对照试验研究了动脉导管未闭(PDA)的药物治疗,但未能证明死亡率或短期发病率有所改善。我们进行了一项贝叶斯荟萃分析以回答这个问题:PDA的药物治疗对极早产儿有益还是有害?贝叶斯荟萃分析显示有强有力的证据支持,与接受安慰剂或期待治疗的婴儿相比,接受PDA药物治疗的婴儿支气管肺发育不良(BPD)以及死亡或BPD的发生率更高。极早产儿PDA的药物治疗可能导致更多并发症而非临床益处。