• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在YouTube上传播生物多样性研究:科学家与第三方主播的实验比较

Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters.

作者信息

Ruzi Selina A, Smith Adrian A, Lee Nicole M

机构信息

North Carolina State University, USA.

North Carolina State University, USA; North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2025 Apr;34(3):380-398. doi: 10.1177/09636625241300646. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1177/09636625241300646
PMID:39815641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927024/
Abstract

Online videos are a popular medium for science communication. These videos can be presented from many perspectives, including scientists sharing their own work or a third-party presenting research findings. A mixed between- and within-subjects experiment ( = 620) was conducted in the United States to assess the impact of narrative perspective on the communication objectives of increasing knowledge, changing perceptions, and influencing behavior related to bee diversity. Results indicate that watching a video presented by a scientist was associated with higher levels of perceived competence and a higher likelihood to mention a person or persons when recalling the video. However, we did not find significant effects of narrative perspective on knowledge gain and behavioral intentions to help support bee diversity.

摘要

在线视频是科学传播的一种流行媒介。这些视频可以从许多角度呈现,包括科学家分享自己的工作或第三方展示研究结果。在美国进行了一项混合的组间和组内实验(=620),以评估叙事视角对增加与蜜蜂多样性相关的知识、改变认知和影响行为等传播目标的影响。结果表明,观看科学家展示的视频与更高水平的感知能力以及回忆视频时提及某个人或某些人的更高可能性相关。然而,我们没有发现叙事视角对知识获取以及支持蜜蜂多样性的行为意图有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe5/11927024/c1741ce486c2/10.1177_09636625241300646-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe5/11927024/3ee55ab8c86f/10.1177_09636625241300646-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe5/11927024/c1741ce486c2/10.1177_09636625241300646-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe5/11927024/3ee55ab8c86f/10.1177_09636625241300646-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe5/11927024/c1741ce486c2/10.1177_09636625241300646-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters.在YouTube上传播生物多样性研究:科学家与第三方主播的实验比较
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Apr;34(3):380-398. doi: 10.1177/09636625241300646. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Accuracy, Quality, and Misinformation of YouTube Abortion Procedural Videos: Cross-Sectional Study.YouTube 堕胎手术视频的准确性、质量和错误信息:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 22;26:e50099. doi: 10.2196/50099.
5
Assessing inclusion and representativeness on digital platforms for health education: Evidence from YouTube.评估健康教育数字平台的包容性和代表性:来自 YouTube 的证据。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104669. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
6
Assessing Message Deployment During Public Health Emergencies Through Social Media: Empirical Test of Optimizing Content for Effective Dissemination.通过社交媒体评估公共卫生突发事件中的信息传播:优化内容以实现有效传播的实证检验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e50871. doi: 10.2196/50871.
7
Social Media Depictions of the Impact of Noise Pollution on Communication and Mental and Physical Health.社交媒体对噪声污染对沟通以及身心健康影响的描述
J Community Health. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01457-7.
8
Consumption of Health-Related Videos and Human Papillomavirus Awareness: Cross-Sectional Analyses of a US National Survey and YouTube From the Urban-Rural Context.健康相关视频的消费与人类乳头瘤病毒认知:基于美国全国调查和 YouTube 的城乡视角的横断面分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 15;26:e49749. doi: 10.2196/49749.
9
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.中国大陆在线视频作为中风预防公共卫生教育信息来源的质量与可靠性:基于电子媒体的横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 21;5:e64891. doi: 10.2196/64891.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing how different narrative perspectives achieve communication objectives and goals in online natural science videos.测试不同叙事视角如何在网络自然科学视频中实现传播目标。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0257866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257866. eCollection 2021.
2
Opinion: Eight simple actions that individuals can take to save insects from global declines.观点:个人可以采取的八项拯救昆虫免遭全球数量减少的简单行动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002547117.
3
Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media.
利用人际沟通策略鼓励社交媒体上的科学对话。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241972. eCollection 2020.
4
Human dimensions of insect pollinator conservation.昆虫传粉媒介保护的人文维度。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2020 Apr;38:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
International scientists formulate a roadmap for insect conservation and recovery.国际科学家制定昆虫保护与恢复路线图。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb;4(2):174-176. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1079-8.
6
Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists' willingness to choose specific tactics.策略性科学传播作为计划行为:理解科学家选择特定策略的意愿。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 22;14(10):e0224039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224039. eCollection 2019.
7
Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists.用自拍来挑战公众对科学家的刻板印象。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216625. eCollection 2019.
8
"Insectageddon": A call for more robust data and rigorous analyses.“昆虫末日”:呼吁获取更可靠的数据并进行严谨分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):1891-1892. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14608. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Scientists' views about communication objectives.科学家对传播目标的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Aug;27(6):708-730. doi: 10.1177/0963662517728478. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
10
The Immoral Landscape? Scientists Are Associated with Violations of Morality.《不道德的图景?科学家与道德违规行为有关联》
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0152798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152798. eCollection 2016.