• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助微创经椎间孔椎间融合术:完整工作流程的初步可行性研究

Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a complete workflow pilot feasibility study.

作者信息

Wan Joseph Jon Yin, Tan Yong Yao, Ker Justin Rui Xin, Dinesh Shree Kumar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Neurosurgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 20;10(4):653-662. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-70. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

DOI:10.21037/jss-24-70
PMID:39816779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11732329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.

METHODS

Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.

摘要

背景

据报道,机器人辅助脊柱手术通过更小的切口提高了器械置入的准确性,改善了手术效果并缩短了住院时间。然而,迄今为止,机器人辅助脊柱手术仅限于椎弓根螺钉器械的置入。本前瞻性研究旨在探讨在我们机构中,使用Mazor™ X Stealth Edition(美敦力公司,美国索法莫丹尼克)机器人手臂平台进行包括椎间融合器置入的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)的可行性。

方法

单中心、单术者前瞻性收集了29例计划采用Mazor™ X Stealth系统进行机器人辅助MIS-TLIF(RA-TLIF)患者的病例系列,记录患者人口统计学信息[年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)]及术后结果。

结果

在计划的29例RA-TLIF病例中,2例因软件启动问题被排除。1例患者因椎间融合器向后移位接受了翻修手术。在6个月的随访中,所有病例均未发现后路器械松动。

结论

我们关于Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF的单机构前瞻性研究显示,椎弓根螺钉置入准确性高,并发症发生率相对较低,与传统MIS-TLIF O型臂导航系统相当。然而,经验丰富的外科医生应留意潜在的系统相关问题,并了解机器人辅助椎间融合器置入的局限性。在考虑广泛应用之前,还需要对患者预后和成本效益进行进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/cd4ac9fb92e3/jss-10-04-653-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/5ebc2fb16287/jss-10-04-653-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/83810fa26d17/jss-10-04-653-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/8a3c24bba9ba/jss-10-04-653-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/6cee43d79a16/jss-10-04-653-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/cd4ac9fb92e3/jss-10-04-653-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/5ebc2fb16287/jss-10-04-653-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/83810fa26d17/jss-10-04-653-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/8a3c24bba9ba/jss-10-04-653-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/6cee43d79a16/jss-10-04-653-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/11732329/cd4ac9fb92e3/jss-10-04-653-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a complete workflow pilot feasibility study.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔椎间融合术:完整工作流程的初步可行性研究
J Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 20;10(4):653-662. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-70. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.机器人辅助减压、去皮质术及器械置入用于微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Dec 6;14(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00080. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.机器人辅助与透视辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的比较:2年随访
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01442-5. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
4
Irradiation safety, anesthesia time, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes in the robotic Mazor X versus fluoroscopy guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a comparative cohort study.机器人 Mazor X 与透视引导下微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的放射安全性、麻醉时间、手术并发症和患者报告的结果:一项比较队列研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Dec 1;57(6):E11. doi: 10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24489.
5
[Efficacy comparison of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases].机器人辅助与徒手透视辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 8;104(37):3498-3505. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240330-00729.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.经皮内镜机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PE RA-TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱:技术说明和两年临床结果。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E73-E86.
7
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
8
Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.O型臂导航与显微镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术及传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎峡部裂性脊柱滑脱的比较
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Oct 31;20:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.001. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
Comparison between robot-assisted and navigation-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.机器人辅助与导航引导微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的比较:一项多中心研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Dec 1;57(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24521.
10
Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement During Spine Surgery.脊柱手术中机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 May 21;10(2):e0020. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00020. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of robotic AI-assisted and manual pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective controlled trial.机器人人工智能辅助与手动椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的比较:一项回顾性对照试验。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 4;13:1491775. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1491775. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Lumbar Pedicle Morphometry of Dry Vertebral Columns in Relation to Transpedicular Fixation: A Cross-Sectional Study From Central India.与经椎弓根固定相关的干燥脊柱腰椎椎弓根形态测量:来自印度中部的横断面研究
Cureus. 2023 Apr 25;15(4):e38108. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38108. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective matched-cohort study.机器人辅助经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05654-0. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement under Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
机器人辅助下在区域麻醉下经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 20;2021:6894001. doi: 10.1155/2021/6894001. eCollection 2021.
4
Ninety-day complication, revision, and readmission rates for current-generation robot-assisted thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery: results of a multicenter case series.当代机器人辅助胸腰椎脊柱融合手术的90天并发症、翻修及再入院率:一项多中心病例系列研究结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 26;36(5):841-848. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21330. Print 2022 May 1.
5
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/os.13044. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients.导航机器人组和非导航机器人组在机器人辅助脊柱手术中是否存在差异?一项多中心、倾向评分匹配分析的 2800 枚螺钉和 372 例患者。
Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1504-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.015. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective matched-control analysis for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的回顾性匹配对照分析:临床和生活质量结果。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Jul;10(10):845-856. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0078. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
9
Thoracic and lumbar spine pedicle morphology in Japanese patients.日本患者的胸腰椎椎弓根形态。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Jun;43(6):833-842. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02707-8. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Mazor X Stealth Robotic Technology: A Technical Note.Mazor X 机器人智能导航骨科手术系统:技术说明。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 12.