Hanson Ashley, Burton Christopher
Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent Devon, UK
North Devon District Hospital, Barnstaple, Kent Devon, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e087836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087836.
To map what is currently known about knowledge translation (KT) in Anglo-American paramedicine. The review focuses on reported barriers and facilitators to the implementation of new knowledge, and the use of models, theories and frameworks to guide implementation practice.
Scoping review reported as per both the Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines.
CINAHL (EBSCO Host) and Medline (OVID interface) were searched from January 2000 to May 2023. Reference lists of all included papers were reviewed, and several key professional journals were hand-searched.
Primary sources that focused on KT models, theories or frameworks, or barriers and facilitators to KT implementation, involving paramedics or Emergency Medical Technicians (Paramedic in America) working in an out-of-hospital, Anglo-American Emergency Medical Service (EMS) system were eligible for inclusion.
One reviewer used a data extraction template developed for this review and 10% of the papers were checked by the second author. Findings were summarised in tables and synthesised both quantitatively and qualitatively.
The search yielded 1268 primary sources, of which 48 were included in the review. Thirty-two papers examining KT interventions and 16 papers examining the barriers and facilitators to KT were found. Only one randomised controlled trial was found, and only one paper made explicit use of any KT framework. Overall, eight themes describing barriers and facilitators to KT arose from the qualitative literature, with clinicians' perception of the evidence being the dominant theme. All 32 papers describing KT interventions included some form of educational intervention.
Overall, there is little depth and breadth in the literature, with many papers focusing on trauma and airway management. There are large gaps in the evidence surrounding the use of KT theories and frameworks in Anglo-American EMS. Further research is needed to identify appropriate KT models and frameworks that are contextualised to EMS to ensure that paramedic-led research finds its way to the clinicians needing to use it.
梳理当前英美式护理急救领域中关于知识转化(KT)的已知内容。本综述聚焦于新的知识应用实施过程中所报道的障碍和促进因素,以及用于指导实施实践的模型、理论和框架。
按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所和系统评价与荟萃分析扩展版的范围综述报告指南进行范围综述。
检索了2000年1月至2023年5月期间的CINAHL(EBSCO主机)和Medline(OVID界面)。对所有纳入论文的参考文献列表进行了审查,并对手工检索了几本关键专业期刊。
聚焦于KT模型、理论或框架,或KT实施的障碍和促进因素的原始资料,涉及在英美式院外急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中工作的护理人员或急救医疗技术员(美国护理人员),均符合纳入条件。
一名评审员使用为本综述开发的数据提取模板,第二作者对10%的论文进行了核对。研究结果以表格形式总结,并进行了定量和定性综合分析。
检索到1268篇原始资料,其中48篇纳入本综述。发现了32篇研究KT干预措施的论文和16篇研究KT障碍和促进因素的论文。仅发现一项随机对照试验,且只有一篇论文明确使用了任何KT框架。总体而言,定性文献中出现了八个描述KT障碍和促进因素的主题,其中临床医生对证据的认知是主导主题。所有32篇描述KT干预措施的论文都包含某种形式的教育干预。
总体而言,该文献的深度和广度不足,许多论文聚焦于创伤和气道管理。在英美式EMS中,围绕KT理论和框架的使用证据存在很大差距。需要进一步研究以确定适合EMS背景的KT模型和框架,以确保护理人员主导的研究能够应用于需要使用这些研究成果的临床医生。