Suppr超能文献

两个国家计量机构对单元素校准溶液的不同表征方法的比较。

Comparison of different characterization approaches for monoelemental calibration solutions at two national metrology institutes.

作者信息

Tunç Murat, Paredes Cristhian, Coşkun F Gonca, Serna Juliana, Caner Merve

机构信息

TÜBİTAK-UME National Metrology Institute, Gebze Yerleşkesi Barış Mah. Dr. Zeki Acar Cad. No:1, 41470, Gebze, Kocaeli, Türkiye.

Grupo de Investigación en Metrología Química y Bioanálisis, Instituto Nacional de Metrología de Colombia, Ak. 50 26 - 55 Int. 2, Bogotá, 111321, Colombia.

出版信息

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 May;417(12):2603-2616. doi: 10.1007/s00216-025-05731-4. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

Abstract

Monoelemental calibration solutions are the most common reference in elemental analysis, linking measurement results to the International System of Units (SI). National Metrology Institutes (NMI) prepare these solutions as certified reference materials (CRM) and determine their elemental mass fraction with high accuracy. Characterization with high accuracy is one of the most critical steps in CRM production. This report compares the approaches taken by the NMIs of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK-UME) and Colombia (INM(CO)) in preparing and characterizing cadmium calibration solutions with a nominal value of 1 g kg. Each NMI produced CRMs using an independent batch of cadmium calibration solution and assigned mass fraction values to both their own solutions and those of the other NMIs. TÜBİTAK-UME employed a primary difference method (PDM) to assess the purity of a cadmium metal standard, quantifying all possible impurities using a combination of instrumental analytical techniques. The defined purity standard was used for both the gravimetric preparation of the CRM and the calibration of high-performance inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) measurements. On the other hand, INM(CO) used gravimetric titration with EDTA to assay cadmium in the CRM solutions. The EDTA salt was previously characterized by titrimetry. Despite the fundamentally different measurement methods and independent metrological traceability paths to the SI, the measurement results exhibited excellent agreement within the stated uncertainties. This comparative analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of varied characterization approaches and underscores the reliability of the cadmium calibration solutions prepared by TÜBİTAK-UME and INM(CO). This collaborative effort highlights the reliability and adaptability of various measurement techniques in fulfilling rigorous metrological standards for elemental calibration solutions. Furthermore, this approach enhances the robustness of the measurements in the field of elemental analysis and contributes traceability to the SI.

摘要

单元素校准溶液是元素分析中最常见的参考标准,它将测量结果与国际单位制(SI)联系起来。国家计量机构(NMI)将这些溶液制备成有证标准物质(CRM),并高精度地确定其元素质量分数。高精度表征是CRM生产中最关键的步骤之一。本报告比较了土耳其(TÜBİTAK-UME)和哥伦比亚(INM(CO))的国家计量机构在制备和表征标称值为1 g/kg的镉校准溶液时所采用的方法。每个国家计量机构都使用独立批次的镉校准溶液生产CRM,并为自己的溶液以及其他国家计量机构的溶液赋予质量分数值。TÜBİTAK-UME采用主差法(PDM)评估镉金属标准的纯度,使用多种仪器分析技术组合对所有可能的杂质进行定量。确定的纯度标准既用于CRM的重量法制备,也用于高性能电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)测量的校准。另一方面,INM(CO)使用EDTA重量滴定法测定CRM溶液中的镉。EDTA盐先前已通过滴定法进行表征。尽管测量方法存在根本差异,且与SI的计量溯源路径相互独立,但测量结果在规定的不确定度范围内表现出极佳的一致性。这种比较分析证明了不同表征方法的有效性,并强调了TÜBİTAK-UME和INM(CO)制备的镉校准溶液的可靠性。这种合作努力突出了各种测量技术在满足元素校准溶液严格计量标准方面的可靠性和适应性。此外,这种方法增强了元素分析领域测量的稳健性,并为SI提供了溯源性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/12003560/ae7b2abd3d36/216_2025_5731_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验