文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Clinical effectiveness of entecavir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in chronic hepatitis B treatment.

作者信息

Zhou You, Shen Yanyan, He Jian, Yang Xuefeng

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China.

Hunan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7591-7599. doi: 10.62347/RKNH8649. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.62347/RKNH8649
PMID:39822557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11733369/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical effectiveness of Entecavir (ETV) and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Tablets for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: Clinical data from 100 CHB patients admitted to our hospital from April 2022 to April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 45 cases in the control group received ETV, and 55 cases in the research group received TDF tablets. Data on clinical effectiveness, safety (creatine kinase elevation, fatty liver, and lactic acidosis), hepatic function (total bilirubin [TBIL], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), viral markers (hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid [HBV-DNA] and hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]), and quality of life (the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36], assessing cognitive, physical, emotional, role, social functions) were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The research group showed an evidently higher overall effective rate and a markedly lower incidence of total adverse reactions than the control group (all P<0.05). Additionally, statistically lower post-treatment TBIL, ALT, AST, HBV-DNA, and HBsAg levels and higher SF-36 scores across all five dimensions were observed in the research group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the research group showed markedly higher negative conversion rates of HBsAg after treatment compared to the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: TDF provides better clinical effects in the treatment of CHB than ETV and thus it is worthy of clinical promotion.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Clinical effectiveness of entecavir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in chronic hepatitis B treatment.

Am J Transl Res. 2024-12-15

[2]
A comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir in patients with chronic Hepatitis-B.

Pak J Med Sci. 2024-11

[3]
Comparative efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha monotherapy vs combination therapies with entecavir or tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Microbiol Spectr. 2025-4-2

[4]
Tenofovir is Superior to Entecavir in Patients with Treatment-naïve Hepatitis B e-Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B.

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021

[5]
Therapeutic effectiveness analysis of tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the treatment for chronic hepatitis B.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-5-17

[6]
[Analysis of efficacy and factors influencing sequential combination therapy with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate after treatment with entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viremia].

Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2023-2-20

[7]
[Clinical effect of entecavir versus tenofovir in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with a high viral load: a comparative analysis].

Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2017-10-20

[8]
Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir for initial treatment of patient with chronic hepatitis B in China.

Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015-1-15

[9]
Comparison of the Efficacy of Tenofovir Versus Tenofovir plus Entecavir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Patients With Poor Efficacy of Entecavir: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin Ther. 2017-9

[10]
Differential Relapse Patterns After Discontinuation of Entecavir vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Therapeutic effectiveness analysis of tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the treatment for chronic hepatitis B.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-5-17

[2]
Entecavir: A Review and Considerations for Its Application in Oncology.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023-11-14

[3]
Factors affecting HBV DNA suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

F1000Res. 2023-8-24

[4]
Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (version 2022).

J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023-11-28

[5]
Modelling the dynamics of acute and chronic hepatitis B with optimal control.

Sci Rep. 2023-9-11

[6]
Population pharmacokinetics of tenofovir given as either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide in an African population.

CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023-6

[7]
Entecavir versus tenofovir on prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023-6

[8]
Estimating the epidemiology of chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection in the UK: what do we know and what are we missing?

Wellcome Open Res. 2023-3-9

[9]
Efficacy and safety of long-term postpartum antiviral therapy in hepatitis B virus-infected mothers receiving prophylactic tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023-2-1

[10]
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Korean J Radiol. 2022-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索