Sala Alessandra, Di Mauro Michele, Zancanaro Edoardo, Bargagna Marta, Grimaldi Francesco, D'Oria Veronica, Menicanti Lorenzo, Alfieri Ottavio, De Bonis Michele, de Vincentiis Carlo
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, Pierangeli Hospital, Pescara, Italy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 May;119(5):990-999. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.028. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) with the David technique is an established therapy for aortic root pathology in young patients. This study evaluated short- and long-term outcomes between VSRR and aortic root replacement (ARR) with a biological-valved conduit in sexagenarians.
A multicenter retrospective review from 2002 to 2022 identified 299 sexagenarians undergoing aortic root surgery, among whom 82 (27.4%) underwent VSRR and 217 (72.6%) underwent bio-Bentall. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance clinical variables. Median follow-up was 15 years (interquartile range, 12-18 years). Study end points were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, freedom from reintervention, and recurrence of at least moderate aortic regurgitation (AR).
There were no major differences in baseline characteristics. The incidence of bicuspid valves (VSRR, 4.9%; ARR, 19%), severe AR (42% vs 51%), type A aortic dissection (1.2% vs 6.9%), and reoperation (4% vs 23%) were higher in ARR. After IPTW, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality (VSRR, 1.2%; ARR, 4.6%; P = .3). The incidence of neurologic complications (P = .003) and permanent pacemaker implantation (P = .022) were significantly higher in the bio-Bentall group. After IPTW, 10-year survival did not differ between VSRR (87%) and ARR (80%; P = .176). However, cardiac survival was significantly higher in VSRR patients (98% vs 92%, P = .018), with deaths mainly due to infective endocarditis and end-stage heart failure. No difference was reported in reoperation/recurrence of at least moderate AR among the groups at 10 years, with only 1 patient undergoing reintervention after bio-Bentall (P = .117).
David and bio-Bentall procedures have low in-hospital mortality and good long-term survival in sexagenarians. VSRR is associated with improved long-term cardiac survival, lower rates of infective endocarditis, permanent pacemaker implantation, and heart failure episodes, with similar rates of reintervention/recurrence of moderate AR.
采用大卫技术的保留瓣膜根部置换术(VSRR)是治疗年轻患者主动脉根部病变的成熟疗法。本研究评估了老年患者中VSRR与使用生物瓣膜管道进行主动脉根部置换术(ARR)的短期和长期结果。
对2002年至2022年的一项多中心回顾性研究进行分析,确定了299例接受主动脉根部手术的老年患者,其中82例(27.4%)接受了VSRR,217例(72.6%)接受了生物Bentall手术。应用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)来平衡临床变量。中位随访时间为15年(四分位间距,12 - 18年)。研究终点为住院死亡率、长期生存率、无需再次干预以及至少中度主动脉瓣反流(AR)的复发情况。
基线特征无重大差异。ARR组中双叶瓣发生率(VSRR组为4.9%,ARR组为19%)、重度AR发生率(42%对51%)、A型主动脉夹层发生率(1.2%对6.9%)以及再次手术率(4%对23%)更高。IPTW后,住院死亡率无差异(VSRR组为1.2%,ARR组为4.6%;P = 0.3)。生物Bentall组的神经并发症发生率(P = 0.003)和永久性起搏器植入率(P = 0.022)显著更高。IPTW后,VSRR组(87%)和ARR组(80%)的10年生存率无差异(P = 0.176)。然而,VSRR患者的心脏生存率显著更高(98%对92%,P = 0.018),死亡主要归因于感染性心内膜炎和终末期心力衰竭。10年时,各组间再次手术/至少中度AR复发情况无差异,生物Bentall术后仅1例患者接受了再次干预(P = 0.117)。
大卫手术和生物Bentall手术在老年患者中住院死亡率低,长期生存率良好。VSRR与改善的长期心脏生存率、较低的感染性心内膜炎、永久性起搏器植入和心力衰竭发作率相关,中度AR的再次干预/复发率相似。