Suppr超能文献

60至75岁患者保留瓣膜与生物Bentall主动脉根部置换术:生存率、再次干预及主动脉瓣反流

Valve-Sparing vs Bio-Bentall Aortic Root Replacement in Patients Aged 60 to 75 Years: Survival, Reintervention, and Aortic Regurgitation.

作者信息

Sala Alessandra, Di Mauro Michele, Zancanaro Edoardo, Bargagna Marta, Grimaldi Francesco, D'Oria Veronica, Menicanti Lorenzo, Alfieri Ottavio, De Bonis Michele, de Vincentiis Carlo

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, Pierangeli Hospital, Pescara, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 May;119(5):990-999. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.028. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) with the David technique is an established therapy for aortic root pathology in young patients. This study evaluated short- and long-term outcomes between VSRR and aortic root replacement (ARR) with a biological-valved conduit in sexagenarians.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review from 2002 to 2022 identified 299 sexagenarians undergoing aortic root surgery, among whom 82 (27.4%) underwent VSRR and 217 (72.6%) underwent bio-Bentall. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance clinical variables. Median follow-up was 15 years (interquartile range, 12-18 years). Study end points were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, freedom from reintervention, and recurrence of at least moderate aortic regurgitation (AR).

RESULTS

There were no major differences in baseline characteristics. The incidence of bicuspid valves (VSRR, 4.9%; ARR, 19%), severe AR (42% vs 51%), type A aortic dissection (1.2% vs 6.9%), and reoperation (4% vs 23%) were higher in ARR. After IPTW, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality (VSRR, 1.2%; ARR, 4.6%; P = .3). The incidence of neurologic complications (P = .003) and permanent pacemaker implantation (P = .022) were significantly higher in the bio-Bentall group. After IPTW, 10-year survival did not differ between VSRR (87%) and ARR (80%; P = .176). However, cardiac survival was significantly higher in VSRR patients (98% vs 92%, P = .018), with deaths mainly due to infective endocarditis and end-stage heart failure. No difference was reported in reoperation/recurrence of at least moderate AR among the groups at 10 years, with only 1 patient undergoing reintervention after bio-Bentall (P = .117).

CONCLUSIONS

David and bio-Bentall procedures have low in-hospital mortality and good long-term survival in sexagenarians. VSRR is associated with improved long-term cardiac survival, lower rates of infective endocarditis, permanent pacemaker implantation, and heart failure episodes, with similar rates of reintervention/recurrence of moderate AR.

摘要

背景

采用大卫技术的保留瓣膜根部置换术(VSRR)是治疗年轻患者主动脉根部病变的成熟疗法。本研究评估了老年患者中VSRR与使用生物瓣膜管道进行主动脉根部置换术(ARR)的短期和长期结果。

方法

对2002年至2022年的一项多中心回顾性研究进行分析,确定了299例接受主动脉根部手术的老年患者,其中82例(27.4%)接受了VSRR,217例(72.6%)接受了生物Bentall手术。应用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)来平衡临床变量。中位随访时间为15年(四分位间距,12 - 18年)。研究终点为住院死亡率、长期生存率、无需再次干预以及至少中度主动脉瓣反流(AR)的复发情况。

结果

基线特征无重大差异。ARR组中双叶瓣发生率(VSRR组为4.9%,ARR组为19%)、重度AR发生率(42%对51%)、A型主动脉夹层发生率(1.2%对6.9%)以及再次手术率(4%对23%)更高。IPTW后,住院死亡率无差异(VSRR组为1.2%,ARR组为4.6%;P = 0.3)。生物Bentall组的神经并发症发生率(P = 0.003)和永久性起搏器植入率(P = 0.022)显著更高。IPTW后,VSRR组(87%)和ARR组(80%)的10年生存率无差异(P = 0.176)。然而,VSRR患者的心脏生存率显著更高(98%对92%,P = 0.018),死亡主要归因于感染性心内膜炎和终末期心力衰竭。10年时,各组间再次手术/至少中度AR复发情况无差异,生物Bentall术后仅1例患者接受了再次干预(P = 0.117)。

结论

大卫手术和生物Bentall手术在老年患者中住院死亡率低,长期生存率良好。VSRR与改善的长期心脏生存率、较低的感染性心内膜炎、永久性起搏器植入和心力衰竭发作率相关,中度AR的再次干预/复发率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验